Active Users:616 Time:19/03/2026 02:15:25 AM
Re: Wait! Datakim Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM

In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.


Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.

CK was created at the end of the war, after the whole balefire thing. This means that when those cities were balefired, LESS power was used than CK at maximum.

It seems to me then, that if the power was directly connected to the width of the destruction area, to destroy a city of 100K people would have required a truly humongous amount of power. More than the AoLers had available.

I mean when Rand, the most powerfull channeler, using an angreal creates the most powerfull balefirestream he can, its about the thickness of a man. A meter or so maybe? How big is a city of 100K. Many kilometers certainly. If the only way to increase the thickness of the bar is extra strength. and the most powerfull channeler, with an angreal could only create a bar meter thick, imagine the sheer immense power required to do one several kilometers thick to wipe out a city in a single blow.

So it seems likely to me that there is a way to create a balefire bar that destroyes things in a large area, but only burns things back a short time. Essentially, this strongly implies that a skilled channeler can alter the form of the balefire. It can be a spear directed at a single target with most of the strength in it going to burn the target backwards as much as possible. Or it can be a sort of weapon of mass destruction, where the strength is added to the area effected, while lessening the time the threads burn backwards.

Given that, the most likely explanation to me was that Rand, using LTT knowledge did just that. He used the CK to create a beam wide enough to erase the whole of the palace at a single blow, but still kept the total strength level low to miminize the damage to the pattern.

I should also say that if the pattern could survive the instant annihilation of hundred thousand people at a single instant, how bad could the deaths of 300 people truly be? Adds more credence to the idea that Rand, with LTT's memories knows far better how much the pattern can take than Cadsuane or any other AS.

Seems clear to me, though I do admit that I am pretty tired and going to bed now. Hopefully this will still make sense to me in the morning.

Goodnight all!
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1802 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1212 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1207 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1221 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1133 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 1041 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1120 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 1035 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 1023 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 998 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 1001 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 952 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 988 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 970 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1091 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 989 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1092 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 1010 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1066 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 996 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1064 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 959 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1097 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1099 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 1057 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1135 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 936 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1086 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 526 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 989 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 1004 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 970 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 532 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 936 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 528 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 970 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 926 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1071 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 1030 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 1026 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 1026 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 1032 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 1009 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1074 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 964 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1070 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 914 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 1011 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 986 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 1009 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 1013 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 937 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 1023 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 989 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 911 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1070 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 1030 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 1031 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 967 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 1004 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 908 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 927 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1098 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 932 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 935 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 1032 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 999 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 989 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1066 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 916 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 968 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 1022 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 949 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1098 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1068 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 995 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 1032 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 930 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1067 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 1009 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 1011 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 948 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 1023 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1199 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1333 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 909 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 940 Views

Reply to Message