Active Users:379 Time:09/05/2025 04:47:52 PM
Re: Wait! callandor1000 Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM

In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.

Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.


Not irrelevant at all. If I recall, some things aren't just all about out and out brute strength with the OP. It takes the two halves of the OP working together to accomplish the greatest feats. That's why there were two CK and an access key for each. And the CK weren't simply made for creating balefire, but for resealing the DO's prison, only that effort fell apart when the CK were lost into Shadow territory during the war.

Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.

My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1594 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 993 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 993 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1018 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 921 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 831 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 951 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 864 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 833 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 786 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 785 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 744 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 769 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 750 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 908 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 815 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 878 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 758 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 853 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 791 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 804 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 776 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 887 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 900 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 813 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 927 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 739 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 799 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 411 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 807 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 811 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 773 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 448 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 754 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 393 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 763 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 737 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 869 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 792 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 829 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 821 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 808 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 808 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 827 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 782 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 837 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 724 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 815 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 797 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 806 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 819 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 761 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 833 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 765 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 708 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 885 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 819 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 796 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 750 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 808 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 719 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 741 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 893 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 741 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 745 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 823 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 768 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 801 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 876 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 744 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 749 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 813 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 753 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 897 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 852 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 808 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 840 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 734 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 842 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 792 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 830 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 751 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 824 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 983 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1091 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 719 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 759 Views

Reply to Message