Rand doesn't know; even his explanation of why he did this did not include greater knowledge of the mechanism. He just said Graendal was so dangerous that killing innocent souls to get rid of her was worthwhile. He's not the Creator, doesn't understand the higher laws of reality and neither are Nynaeve or Min. Truly, I think Cadsuane hit the nail on the head when she backed Min up - if Rand himself utilized balefire in such a way that reality wa destabilized and the Bore was torn open, it wouldn't matter if the balefired souls would be Reborn in one, two or whatever Turnings of the Wheel RJ specified - the Dark One would have destroyed reality in any case, and it would be Rand's fault.
I mean, technically, carrying your line of argument to it's ultimate conclusion, it wouldn't even matter if you balefired a Forsaken because they would come back, anyway. They'd be removed from the field, but there are quite a lot of twisted entities such as Shaidar Haran or Slayer that technically speaking, are much more difficult for a Third Age channeler to comprehend or deal with.
I basically think, in the context of the overall story, that the WoT world is largely a post-apocalyptic one, and destabilizing the Pattern in any way when it is already frayed to the breaking point is not a good idea.
I mean, technically, carrying your line of argument to it's ultimate conclusion, it wouldn't even matter if you balefired a Forsaken because they would come back, anyway. They'd be removed from the field, but there are quite a lot of twisted entities such as Shaidar Haran or Slayer that technically speaking, are much more difficult for a Third Age channeler to comprehend or deal with.
I basically think, in the context of the overall story, that the WoT world is largely a post-apocalyptic one, and destabilizing the Pattern in any way when it is already frayed to the breaking point is not a good idea.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1615 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 1017 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 853 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 970 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 889 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 856 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 805 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 928 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 836 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 900 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 786 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 879 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 812 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 850 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1283 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 923 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 867 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 426 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 827 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 458 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 774 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 894 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 813 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 852 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 845 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 832 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 829 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 846 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 806 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 788 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 759 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 862 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 749 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 819 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 827 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 840 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 784 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 853 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 784 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 728 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 907 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 841 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 822 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 917 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 759 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 768 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 843 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 790 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 821 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 767 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 773 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 835 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 777 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 920 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 876 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 827 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 861 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 755 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 865 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 846 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 771 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 851 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 854 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 766 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1076 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 803 Views