A couple hundred people is nothing, look at wars in the real world many more than a few hundred civilians die.
And that is how the slippery slope begins. These types of things tend to start with that line of reasoning, with the line of reasoning escalating. If I was a more religious person, I could argue that in the real world, we aren't talking about souls but physical bodies, and as terrible as mass murder is their souls would still be saved by a God somewhere. What Rand did was demolish those souls with little understanding if those would ever come back - judging from the behavior of him and his companions they all assumed that those souls were gone forever, and I think it's unfortunate that so many of the arguments here bring in RJ's statement to justify it. If President Bush had decided to nuke Afghanistan and Iraq saying that the souls would be reborn in another few generations, we'd call him insane, yet in the bounds of this fictional world there are too many people IMO willing to concede that this is rational. It was not a rational act. It was the act of the madman and power mad tyrant that Rand stood on the threshhold of becoming.
We actually saw this slipper slope escalate in the books: After balefiring the hundreds of people at Graendals' palace, Rand later threatens to rain fire using the Choedan Kal on the Borderlander army which consisted of thousands of people, and later even then he considers to wipe out the headquarters of the Seanchan incursion with balefire - that is a population that dwarfed what was in Graendal's place.
The problem with rationalizing these types of things is that you lose your humanity by denying that other people have a valid right to existence.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1661 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 1064 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 895 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 1020 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 926 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 898 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 848 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 972 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 878 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 947 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 855 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 923 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 857 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 915 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1330 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 962 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 942 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 454 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 872 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 481 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 819 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 932 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 852 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 895 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 888 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 895 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 886 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 911 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 839 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 828 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 801 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 936 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 786 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 861 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 870 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 886 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 830 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 898 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 846 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 783 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 953 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 889 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 874 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 967 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 805 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 814 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 895 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 855 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 861 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 802 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 812 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 878 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 826 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 966 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 917 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 865 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 906 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 805 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 912 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 894 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 815 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 894 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 947 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 811 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1118 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 847 Views