Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
Rand Travels in disguised under an illusion of invisibility, tracks Graendal down by advancing through her palace and balefires her while she is bathing.
Or a re-use of the Rahvin Scenario: Rand Travels in with a fighting force with orders to only kill those Compelled to attack them, he brings Nynayeve/Cadsuane/random Aes Sedai in his retinue/Wondergirl/a channeling member of his harem/Wise Ones in to detect saidar. Graendal has some sort of defense that doesn't take him out, he chases her down preventing her Gateways from opening all the way each time she tries and finally balefires her just as she's about to escape through an inverted Gateway.
Etc, etc.
Or a re-use of the Rahvin Scenario: Rand Travels in with a fighting force with orders to only kill those Compelled to attack them, he brings Nynayeve/Cadsuane/random Aes Sedai in his retinue/Wondergirl/a channeling member of his harem/Wise Ones in to detect saidar. Graendal has some sort of defense that doesn't take him out, he chases her down preventing her Gateways from opening all the way each time she tries and finally balefires her just as she's about to escape through an inverted Gateway.
Etc, etc.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 07/01/2010 at 09:34:09 PM
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1738 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1149 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
968 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1071 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
977 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
965 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
926 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1030 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
931 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1028 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
949 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1005 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
948 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1001 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1436 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1035 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1012 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
497 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
944 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
511 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
885 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1014 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
962 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
959 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
965 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
966 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
944 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1014 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
899 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
906 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
873 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1014 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
847 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
920 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
944 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
951 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
881 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
969 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
913 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
850 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1013 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
966 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
970 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1040 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
880 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
877 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
965 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
940 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
935 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
864 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
899 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
951 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
883 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1033 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions 
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1005 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1005 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
939 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
966 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
868 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1003 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
955 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
887 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
956 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1014 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
874 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1177 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
926 Views