ROFL
I'm sorry but if you think Rand was in any threat going against any of the other Forsaken earlier in the series when he was at his weakest and least effective, than I don't know what to tell you.
He *almost* got sliced by Asmo's hair thin trap, but *luckily* he didn't
He *almost* was blown up by Asmo's exposive wards while chasing him, but *luckily* he conveniently threw up a superhard bubble of Air
He *almost* got his foot sliced off by his own closing Gateway while chasing Asmo, but *luckily* it only took off a bit of his heel
He *almost* died when Rahvin's trap triggered, but *luckily* it killed everyone around him but him
He *almost* got balefired himself, but *luckily* he wove it in the microsecond before it hit him and both canceled each other out
He *almost* got killed alongside Aviendha and Egwene while fighting the Shaido but *luckily* he didn't (and used a cushion of Air to save them all which we have never seen duplicated nor mentioned again in the series despite it's usefulness)
I'm sorry, but I have to do a ROFL ESPECIALLY when you say "How do you surprise someone who can't be surprised" when we have seen Graendal surprised by Sammael into remaining in their partnership and then bated into anger and almost standing and fighting Lanfear (BTW she would have been quite "surprised" if Sammael had done whatever he was going to do rather be interrupted).
I mean, I'm sorry, but the series is just not set up to really accept that he had no choices. So, as I said before, I understand that you are trying to defend his status of a mass murderer by implying that he had no choice, but he's actually been on quite a roll in the last few books wiping the floor with anyone who directly attacks him.
My point IS that a debate about whether Rand had a choice is meaningless because using Tel'Aran'Rhiod or his Talent for Travelling could have conceivably been used as a convenient plot point to drop him right on Graendal's head.
But that was not your question: Your question was "Did Rand become a psycho?" And my answer is, and remains, yes. Did he mass murder people and consider it a couple more times in the books? Yes. Did he have a choice as to how he confronted Graendal? Yes; but he didn't - because it wouldn't have fit the plot.
I mean, at this point in the story, he could have forced his t'a'veren powers to make Graendal have a stroke or Travel right to him, and it might have happened.
I'm sorry but if you think Rand was in any threat going against any of the other Forsaken earlier in the series when he was at his weakest and least effective, than I don't know what to tell you.
He *almost* got sliced by Asmo's hair thin trap, but *luckily* he didn't
He *almost* was blown up by Asmo's exposive wards while chasing him, but *luckily* he conveniently threw up a superhard bubble of Air
He *almost* got his foot sliced off by his own closing Gateway while chasing Asmo, but *luckily* it only took off a bit of his heel
He *almost* died when Rahvin's trap triggered, but *luckily* it killed everyone around him but him
He *almost* got balefired himself, but *luckily* he wove it in the microsecond before it hit him and both canceled each other out
He *almost* got killed alongside Aviendha and Egwene while fighting the Shaido but *luckily* he didn't (and used a cushion of Air to save them all which we have never seen duplicated nor mentioned again in the series despite it's usefulness)
I'm sorry, but I have to do a ROFL ESPECIALLY when you say "How do you surprise someone who can't be surprised" when we have seen Graendal surprised by Sammael into remaining in their partnership and then bated into anger and almost standing and fighting Lanfear (BTW she would have been quite "surprised" if Sammael had done whatever he was going to do rather be interrupted).
I mean, I'm sorry, but the series is just not set up to really accept that he had no choices. So, as I said before, I understand that you are trying to defend his status of a mass murderer by implying that he had no choice, but he's actually been on quite a roll in the last few books wiping the floor with anyone who directly attacks him.
My point IS that a debate about whether Rand had a choice is meaningless because using Tel'Aran'Rhiod or his Talent for Travelling could have conceivably been used as a convenient plot point to drop him right on Graendal's head.
But that was not your question: Your question was "Did Rand become a psycho?" And my answer is, and remains, yes. Did he mass murder people and consider it a couple more times in the books? Yes. Did he have a choice as to how he confronted Graendal? Yes; but he didn't - because it wouldn't have fit the plot.
I mean, at this point in the story, he could have forced his t'a'veren powers to make Graendal have a stroke or Travel right to him, and it might have happened.
Actually I don't think there is any conceivable way he could have killed or caught Graendal other than surprising her like he did. Lews Therin makes it quite clear that Graendal cannot be baited, ambushed or tracked. He says that she is verifiably more intelligent and devious than him.
I think Graendal had plans we couldn't even conceive of - wardings all over the place, decoys etc. She told Sammael she hopes he has a backup plan after Ilian, which implies that she certainly did if Rand ever went for her.
Moghedien is possibly the most impossible Forsaken to find, but Graendal is second - and she won't give into a grudge like Moghedien will. She'll happily move along to her next base and cause havoc there.
Despite all Rand did, and despite his desperation to catch this woman, WE are still fighting over whether the woman is alive or not. It's a clear indication that even we as readers think she could have escaped that deadly scenario.
		Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
	
	
	
	
	
Fan of Lanfear
			Rand the psycho?
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
	        1701 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
			I cannot follow your assumptions.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
	        1108 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
	        928 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
	        1044 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
	        953 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
	        941 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
	        883 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
	        1002 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
	        905 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
	        978 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
	        908 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
	        964 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
	        900 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
	        960 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
	    
	         - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
	        1385 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Rand crossed a line
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
	        1000 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
			Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
	        979 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
	        477 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			But not in this turning of the Wheel.  So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
	        908 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
	        492 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			LOL ... super-death!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
	        844 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
	        979 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
	        902 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
	        929 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
	        929 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			let me ask the question in a different way
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
	        919 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: let me ask the question in a different way
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
	        914 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			actually that quote supports my thoughts
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
	        961 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
	        868 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
	        864 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
	        829 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
	        982 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Sigh. What mass murder?
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
	        817 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
	        883 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
	        909 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
	        919 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
	        858 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
	        939 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
	        876 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
	        810 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
	        977 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
	        925 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
	        924 Views
	        
	
		
		
	
		
	    
	
	    		
			Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
		
	         - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM
	        875 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
	        1001 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Meh
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
	        838 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
	        841 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
	        928 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
	        894 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
	        906 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
	        831 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
	        857 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
	        921 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
	        854 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
	        998 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions  - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        957 Views
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        957 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        957 Views
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        957 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			Nice way to avoid the argument.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
	        900 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I'm just done talking in circles.  You seem to think that because people
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
	        929 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			I concede
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
	        835 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
	        964 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Morals are subjective anyhow,
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
	        920 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
	        842 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
	    
	         - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
	        917 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
	        981 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
	    
	         - 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
	        840 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive,  Operation Chaos Rules
	    
	         - 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
	        1143 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
	        886 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
 