Active Users:472 Time:15/12/2025 02:18:16 PM
Re: What might work... Datakim Send a noteboard - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM
Is to make a barrier around Graendal's palace, so that she can't Travel away. This seems to be possible, because the Lightside even considered to make a barrier around SG with the Choedan Kal.
After this, Rand could go in through a little hole in the barrier - maybe with some additional troops - and smoke out the enemy.

Of course, to simply balefire the whole palace is easier, even if innocent people are hit.


That would have been the best way. I think I even mentioned somewhere before that this would have been an easy and obvious thing to do. Arguably even easier than what he did in a way since Rand could have been able to see Graendals death with his own eyes that way.

But while RJ says this might be done(blocking gateways), I don't think Rand knows how. I wonder if that means LTT does not know either. I would have expected that he would but the fact that this is never considered might imply he does not. Unless ofcourse this is one of those facts Rand has yet to learn.

I wonder if this might come into play in the next book. Maybe the new Rand/LTT combo coming down from Dragonmount will teach the Asha'man to block traveling. That might help blunt the Seanchan advantage of getting traveling from Elaida.


Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1738 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1149 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1145 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1156 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1077 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 968 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1071 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 977 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 965 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 926 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 934 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 893 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 918 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 910 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1030 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 931 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1029 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 949 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1005 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 948 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1001 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 899 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1019 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1035 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 985 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1076 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 873 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1012 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 497 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 944 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 952 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 907 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 511 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 885 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 508 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 902 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 859 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1014 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 962 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 959 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 965 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 966 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 944 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1014 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 899 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1014 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 847 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 956 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 920 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 944 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 951 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 881 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 969 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 913 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 850 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1014 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 966 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 970 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 910 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 946 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 858 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 872 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1040 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 880 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 877 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 965 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 940 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 936 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 998 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 864 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 899 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 951 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 883 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1033 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1005 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 939 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 966 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 868 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1003 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 940 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 955 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 887 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 956 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1130 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1262 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 846 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 892 Views

Reply to Message