Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
When in fact they are closer to Prisoners of War. So what Rand did was nuke a POW camp because a high ranking General for the enemy was there. How well do you think a legitimate Military Organization would treat a General who did that?
I am not. I am judging the morality. I know they are not combatants. They are civilians, NOT prisoners of war. One might be construed as having some moral obligations to POWs. Your analogy would be more correct if you said concentration camp, rather than POW camp, and that would STILL be a valid target in the situation you describe any way. Just because some government bureaucracy obsessed with image and media double-standards might disapprove of something does not make it immoral. I guess you agree that homosexuality is grounds for dismissal & exclusion then, as the most prominent legitimate Military Organization in the world feels?
they are essentially POWs. Concentration camp is another apt analogy. Your opinion doesn't make something moral to anyone but you. Morality is too subjective/personal to really define... the truly telling part is that Rand found the act immoral, as he later insinuates when he thinks about what he's done.
As for homosexuality in the military, there are military organizations that allow it ... Israel for one,not sure what that has to do with this conversation though.
I'm talking about human rights organizations and the wider military mentality... i.e. a General who did what Rand did would likely be brought up on war crimes charges!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1738 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1149 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
970 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1071 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
977 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
965 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
926 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1030 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
931 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1032 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
949 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1005 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
948 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1002 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1438 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1036 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1014 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
497 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
945 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
511 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
885 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1014 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
964 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
959 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
966 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
966 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
944 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1015 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
899 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
906 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
873 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1014 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
847 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
920 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
946 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
952 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
881 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
969 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
917 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
851 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1015 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
967 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
970 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1040 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
880 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
877 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
966 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
941 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
937 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
865 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
899 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
951 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
884 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1034 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1005 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1005 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
940 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
966 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
868 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1004 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
955 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
887 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
956 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1014 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
875 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1179 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
926 Views
