Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
"Here's another possibility I hadn't mentioned previously. Maybe even damage below the irreparable state causes severe trouble, like the time/space chaos we've observed in the later books. Things like rooms changing places or the Village in Shiota or Hinderstap."
I said something similar to this ine one of my replies. My argument went like this: There was a lot of damage to the Pattern done during the War of Power, this damage was lessened when balefire stopped being used en masse but it was not halted because the Dark One continued to touch the world. In the current Age, the Pattern may not have fully recovered from this past damage, especially given that the world is still reeling from the W.O.P. and The Breaking, so using balefire in such a way at all may be enough to cause a serious rupture in the Pattern.
I think the best way to envision the Age Lace would be to think of the Narrative Chart AesJedai posted in a separate thread (link is attached). Though the flow of the chart does not show specific character actions, you can chart each character's whereabouts during climactic parts of the War of the Ring. Given a sufficient familiarity with the Book, you can say that removing certain threads causes the entire tapestry of lines to fall apart, because during particular moments, the lives and wellbeings of others depended on the actions of that particular thread. Using WoT terminology, for example, if you balefired Arwen, who in the grand scheme of things had a relatively small part to play in the movie, from time/space before she rescued Frodo, Frodo would be dead, and the entire tapestry would fall into a new form after many fluctuations - the yellow-bordered green line may or may not survive the poisoned wound, or it may not make it to the Ring's Destruction. Given that we don't know the relative importance of each and every thread in the Pattern, nor what these threads were supposed to do in the future, you could cause a major rupture in the Pattern by the removal of many such "one note" players.
I said something similar to this ine one of my replies. My argument went like this: There was a lot of damage to the Pattern done during the War of Power, this damage was lessened when balefire stopped being used en masse but it was not halted because the Dark One continued to touch the world. In the current Age, the Pattern may not have fully recovered from this past damage, especially given that the world is still reeling from the W.O.P. and The Breaking, so using balefire in such a way at all may be enough to cause a serious rupture in the Pattern.
I think the best way to envision the Age Lace would be to think of the Narrative Chart AesJedai posted in a separate thread (link is attached). Though the flow of the chart does not show specific character actions, you can chart each character's whereabouts during climactic parts of the War of the Ring. Given a sufficient familiarity with the Book, you can say that removing certain threads causes the entire tapestry of lines to fall apart, because during particular moments, the lives and wellbeings of others depended on the actions of that particular thread. Using WoT terminology, for example, if you balefired Arwen, who in the grand scheme of things had a relatively small part to play in the movie, from time/space before she rescued Frodo, Frodo would be dead, and the entire tapestry would fall into a new form after many fluctuations - the yellow-bordered green line may or may not survive the poisoned wound, or it may not make it to the Ring's Destruction. Given that we don't know the relative importance of each and every thread in the Pattern, nor what these threads were supposed to do in the future, you could cause a major rupture in the Pattern by the removal of many such "one note" players.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1764 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1173 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1005 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1097 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1007 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
997 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
955 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1060 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
959 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1064 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
976 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1034 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
968 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1028 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1471 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1069 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1049 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
510 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
965 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
521 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
906 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1046 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
997 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
995 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
990 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1002 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
971 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1043 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
936 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
942 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
899 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1042 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
880 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
948 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
980 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
982 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
912 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
994 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
953 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
878 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1042 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
994 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1004 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1070 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
903 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
905 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
996 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
973 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
966 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
890 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
932 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
988 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
915 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1072 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1034 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1034 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
970 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
998 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
904 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1038 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
980 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
916 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
992 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1044 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
911 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1208 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
955 Views
