I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
Shishka Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.
I disagree. In my opinion, Ishamael would argue that any distinction made between Good and Evil is ultimately meaningless. And therefore he has no interest at all in trying to define such a distinction.
Ishamael is a Philosopher, and his specific area of study in the AoL was "meaning" - particularly, the meaning of life. And, in the course of pursuing that study, he convinced himself (through what seemed to him to be a logical train of thought) that all acts & endeavors - essentially, all existance - is futile and meaningless. That's what Rand was referring to when he told Ishamael in TGS: "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"
Look at the books Ishamael was purported to have written in the AoL (before he turned to the Shadow). I don't have the Guide with me, so I can't quote the book names exactly, but they were all essentially about the meaninglessness of life. The weren't about Good and Evil at all.
Ishamael is the very epitome of a nihilist. And that nihilism makes him want to destroy the Wheel, and therefore destroy the cycle of birth, futility, meaninglessness, and death it brings (as he sees it).
I don't believe Ishamael turned to the Shadow because he has any special regard for the DO. He turned to the Shadow because his goals coincide with the DO's. Siding with the DO gives him the best opportunity to fulfill his destiny, as he sees it. And, he tries to lure others to the Shadow for the same reason.
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1797 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 837 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 906 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 664 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 692 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 588 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 642 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 599 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 609 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 610 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 550 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 524 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 569 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 642 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 587 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 564 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 984 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 569 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 519 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 552 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 544 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 498 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 499 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 497 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 913 Views

But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 490 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 521 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 528 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 234 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 497 Views