Active Users:405 Time:13/12/2025 04:01:43 PM
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... Shishka Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.


I disagree. In my opinion, Ishamael would argue that any distinction made between Good and Evil is ultimately meaningless. And therefore he has no interest at all in trying to define such a distinction.

Ishamael is a Philosopher, and his specific area of study in the AoL was "meaning" - particularly, the meaning of life. And, in the course of pursuing that study, he convinced himself (through what seemed to him to be a logical train of thought) that all acts & endeavors - essentially, all existance - is futile and meaningless. That's what Rand was referring to when he told Ishamael in TGS: "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"

Look at the books Ishamael was purported to have written in the AoL (before he turned to the Shadow). I don't have the Guide with me, so I can't quote the book names exactly, but they were all essentially about the meaninglessness of life. The weren't about Good and Evil at all.

Ishamael is the very epitome of a nihilist. And that nihilism makes him want to destroy the Wheel, and therefore destroy the cycle of birth, futility, meaninglessness, and death it brings (as he sees it).

I don't believe Ishamael turned to the Shadow because he has any special regard for the DO. He turned to the Shadow because his goals coincide with the DO's. Siding with the DO gives him the best opportunity to fulfill his destiny, as he sees it. And, he tries to lure others to the Shadow for the same reason.

Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1844 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 860 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 302 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 885 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 705 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 742 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 633 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 699 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 679 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 616 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 580 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 564 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 549 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 662 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 599 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 744 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 567 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 554 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 658 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 639 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 680 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 638 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 606 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 575 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 547 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1058 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 616 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 610 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 614 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 569 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 596 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 601 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 541 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 550 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 551 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 955 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 534 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 567 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 533 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 254 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 242 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 623 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 726 Views

Reply to Message