Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
The theory merely states that the wheel is infinite.
If it is infinite and will turn for infinity in the future, that means, the DO will break free.
But if it has already turned infinitely in the past, and the DO has never broken free, then there is no chance of him ever breaking free. So your line of thought never helps the theory, indeed I am sure its not what the writer meant by "1c. the wheel is infinite". He probably made a mistake in his logic when stating an infinite past.
Regardless, your point is still invalid as I mentioned above. An infinite past where the DO has had infinite tries to break free is still possible as an independent idea.
If it is infinite and will turn for infinity in the future, that means, the DO will break free.
But if it has already turned infinitely in the past, and the DO has never broken free, then there is no chance of him ever breaking free. So your line of thought never helps the theory, indeed I am sure its not what the writer meant by "1c. the wheel is infinite". He probably made a mistake in his logic when stating an infinite past.
Regardless, your point is still invalid as I mentioned above. An infinite past where the DO has had infinite tries to break free is still possible as an independent idea.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
This message last edited by car'a'aman on 11/03/2010 at 08:16:34 AM
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1632 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 717 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 755 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 519 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 528 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 443 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 490 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 460 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 453 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 454 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 400 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 371 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 412 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 485 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 430 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 408 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 741 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 422 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 371 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 369 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 358 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 348 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 350 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 348 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 762 Views
But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 350 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 372 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 377 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 176 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 354 Views