Active Users:671 Time:15/09/2026 06:26:34 PM
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
The theory merely states that the wheel is infinite.
If it is infinite and will turn for infinity in the future, that means, the DO will break free.
But if it has already turned infinitely in the past, and the DO has never broken free, then there is no chance of him ever breaking free. So your line of thought never helps the theory, indeed I am sure its not what the writer meant by "1c. the wheel is infinite". He probably made a mistake in his logic when stating an infinite past.

Regardless, your point is still invalid as I mentioned above. An infinite past where the DO has had infinite tries to break free is still possible as an independent idea.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
This message last edited by car'a'aman on 11/03/2010 at 08:16:34 AM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1996 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 1027 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 379 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1034 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 846 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 889 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 758 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 852 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 803 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 750 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 752 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 704 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 682 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 812 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 752 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 873 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 706 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 684 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 797 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 794 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 829 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 783 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 740 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 722 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 698 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1247 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 764 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 742 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 757 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 699 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 769 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 738 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 672 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 683 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 692 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1095 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 665 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 708 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 696 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 321 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 306 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 783 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 907 Views

Reply to Message