Active Users:2089 Time:01/08/2026 01:22:28 PM
Yep, I agree. Shishka Send a noteboard - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM
Ishy realizes he is evil according to the world, but to him it doesn't matter. For he has no need for the term evil, indeed he doesn't believe in it.


If anything, Ishy believes that the cyclic nature of existance provided by the Wheel is evil. But he almost certainly doesn't view himself, or his actions, as evil. He feels no remorse for anything he does.

Did Adolph Hitler think to himself "Yes, what I'm doing is wrong/evil, but it needs to be done nevertheless, so I'll just suck it up and do it."? Of course not. He believed what he was doing was right, and therefore NOT evil. Ishamael is no different.

So he understands why others view him as evil and how repulsive his actions are, but he himself never feels any 'guilt' because he has convinced himself that, at the end of the day, human perceptions such as 'good' and 'evil' don't matter and are meaningless.


I agree that he would consider any distinction between good and evil ultimately meaningless. But I don't think that's why he doesn't consider himself evil, and doesn't feel any guilt/remorse for what he does. He doesn't consider himself evil, and doesn't feel guilt or remorse, because he believes in his cause to such a singular extent that he is devoid of concern towards anything else, be it societal, social, etc. Other humans are simply tools to him - means to an end - and if he occasionally has to destroy those tools, so be it. That's what you do to tools that fail you, you get rid of them and get new ones that function better.
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1968 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 990 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 360 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1007 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 819 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 856 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 739 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 826 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 780 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 727 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 731 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 684 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 659 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 792 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 718 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 855 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 682 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 662 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 770 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 769 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 804 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 763 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 720 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 703 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 670 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1222 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 736 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 718 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 731 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 676 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 745 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 721 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 657 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 661 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 669 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1069 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 643 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 688 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 666 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 311 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 297 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 760 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 889 Views

Reply to Message