What I meant by "could not completely rid the world of evil" was that even if 'dark' Rand beat the Dark One, the world would still not be free of evil. Why would the Seanchan victory be bad? Because they are evil (or at least oppressive). Similarly Rand would cause so much turmoil and sacrifice so much, break the world to a million peices, all for the one goal of fighting the Dark One, that winning would be as bad as losing
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1632 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 717 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 755 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 519 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 528 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 443 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 490 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 460 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 453 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 454 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 400 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 371 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 412 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 486 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 431 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 408 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing
03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM
- 385 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 742 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 422 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 372 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 369 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 358 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 348 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 351 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 349 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 762 Views
But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 351 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 373 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 377 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 176 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 354 Views