What I meant by "could not completely rid the world of evil" was that even if 'dark' Rand beat the Dark One, the world would still not be free of evil. Why would the Seanchan victory be bad? Because they are evil (or at least oppressive). Similarly Rand would cause so much turmoil and sacrifice so much, break the world to a million peices, all for the one goal of fighting the Dark One, that winning would be as bad as losing
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
1907 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
950 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
1022 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
763 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
801 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
691 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
734 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
717 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
738 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
725 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
654 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
633 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
683 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
740 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
710 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
660 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing
- 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM
648 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1169 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
669 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
624 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
679 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
678 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
604 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
613 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
619 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1024 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1024 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
588 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
630 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
642 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
282 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
595 Views
