Active Users:458 Time:31/10/2026 01:23:00 AM
I doubt that. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
I understand what you're saying (I think), but I would word it differently.

Ishamael's beliefs are, by our definition, evil.

Therefore, Ishamael is, by our definition, evil.

But, Ishamael doesn't believe he is evil, nor does he believe the DO is evil, nor does he believe in evil. He simply believes what he believes, and doesn't care about any arbitrary label of that belief as Good or Evil.


I'm fairly certain that Ishamael knows what he's doing is evil. He simply believes that the ends justify the means.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 2030 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 1071 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 402 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1064 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 874 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 915 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 787 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 890 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 837 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 788 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 776 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 736 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 707 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 844 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 787 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 906 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 735 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 720 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 831 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 845 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 867 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 813 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 770 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 761 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 741 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1281 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 789 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 772 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 790 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 728 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 813 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 774 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 704 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 718 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 722 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1127 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 693 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 744 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 725 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 336 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 321 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 812 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 940 Views

Reply to Message