I always took it to mean that like many philosophers, it is easier for Ishamael to be distracted by faulty logic because just because something makes sense on paper or when you think about it, doesn't mean it follows in the real world.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 04/03/2010 at 04:47:34 PM
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1631 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 717 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 755 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 519 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 528 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 443 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 489 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 460 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 453 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 454 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 400 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 371 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 412 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 485 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 430 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 408 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 741 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 422 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 371 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 369 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 358 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 348 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 350 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 348 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 761 Views
But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 350 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 372 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 377 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 176 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 353 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM
- 432 Views