Active Users:2059 Time:02/05/2026 06:08:32 AM
Re: Ishamael's nature RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM
I always took it to mean that like many philosophers, it is easier for Ishamael to be distracted by faulty logic because just because something makes sense on paper or when you think about it, doesn't mean it follows in the real world.

For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.

I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.

Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 04/03/2010 at 04:47:34 PM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1908 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 922 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 327 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 951 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 763 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 801 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 691 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 767 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 734 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 668 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 656 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 639 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 612 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 739 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 654 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 804 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 633 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 612 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 716 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 713 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 741 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 710 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 661 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 648 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 610 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1169 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 678 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 674 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 669 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 624 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 679 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 678 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 605 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 613 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 619 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1024 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 588 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 631 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 596 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 282 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 271 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 698 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 830 Views

Reply to Message