Active Users:668 Time:15/09/2026 06:26:07 PM
Re: Ishamael's nature car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
I was also very interested by the statement that the Dragon's victory could potentially be as dark as his loss.
And I think it ties in to Min's visions of the fireflies trying to match the darkness. Perhaps the collective belief of everyone on the Light's side will be the thing that seals the DO away?


The statement that Rand's victory will be as dark as defeat probably meant that Rand in his mentally deranged state (before Dragonmount and 'veins of gold';) could not completely rid the world of evil. Even if 'hard as cuendillar' Rand won over the DO, it would be at a great price, both in lives as well as maybe Rand himself turning to the Dark.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1995 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 1027 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 379 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1033 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 846 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 888 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 757 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 851 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 803 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 750 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 752 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 703 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 681 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 812 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 752 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 872 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 705 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 683 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 796 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 794 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 829 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 783 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 739 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 721 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 697 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1247 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 763 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 741 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 757 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 698 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 768 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 738 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 671 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 682 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 692 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1094 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 664 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 708 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 695 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 321 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 306 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 783 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 907 Views

Reply to Message