I was also very interested by the statement that the Dragon's victory could potentially be as dark as his loss.
And I think it ties in to Min's visions of the fireflies trying to match the darkness. Perhaps the collective belief of everyone on the Light's side will be the thing that seals the DO away?
And I think it ties in to Min's visions of the fireflies trying to match the darkness. Perhaps the collective belief of everyone on the Light's side will be the thing that seals the DO away?
The statement that Rand's victory will be as dark as defeat probably meant that Rand in his mentally deranged state (before Dragonmount and 'veins of gold'
could not completely rid the world of evil. Even if 'hard as cuendillar' Rand won over the DO, it would be at a great price, both in lives as well as maybe Rand himself turning to the Dark.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
1908 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
951 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
1023 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
763 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
802 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
691 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
734 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
717 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
739 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
725 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
654 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
633 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
684 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
741 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
711 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
661 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1169 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
669 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
624 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
679 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
678 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
605 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
613 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
619 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1024 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1024 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
588 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
631 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
642 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
283 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
596 Views
