Active Users:494 Time:16/06/2026 07:39:57 PM
Re: Ishamael's nature car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
I was also very interested by the statement that the Dragon's victory could potentially be as dark as his loss.
And I think it ties in to Min's visions of the fireflies trying to match the darkness. Perhaps the collective belief of everyone on the Light's side will be the thing that seals the DO away?


The statement that Rand's victory will be as dark as defeat probably meant that Rand in his mentally deranged state (before Dragonmount and 'veins of gold';) could not completely rid the world of evil. Even if 'hard as cuendillar' Rand won over the DO, it would be at a great price, both in lives as well as maybe Rand himself turning to the Dark.
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1928 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 945 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 338 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 970 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 784 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 821 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 713 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 787 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 753 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 683 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 694 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 655 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 636 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 759 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 673 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 827 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 649 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 631 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 734 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 734 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 764 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 730 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 683 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 669 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 630 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1182 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 703 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 690 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 687 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 642 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 701 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 693 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 628 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 629 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 637 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1042 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 607 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 648 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 630 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 294 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 279 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 710 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 850 Views

Reply to Message