Active Users:197 Time:19/05/2024 04:32:15 PM
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... Shishka Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.


I disagree. In my opinion, Ishamael would argue that any distinction made between Good and Evil is ultimately meaningless. And therefore he has no interest at all in trying to define such a distinction.

Ishamael is a Philosopher, and his specific area of study in the AoL was "meaning" - particularly, the meaning of life. And, in the course of pursuing that study, he convinced himself (through what seemed to him to be a logical train of thought) that all acts & endeavors - essentially, all existance - is futile and meaningless. That's what Rand was referring to when he told Ishamael in TGS: "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"

Look at the books Ishamael was purported to have written in the AoL (before he turned to the Shadow). I don't have the Guide with me, so I can't quote the book names exactly, but they were all essentially about the meaninglessness of life. The weren't about Good and Evil at all.

Ishamael is the very epitome of a nihilist. And that nihilism makes him want to destroy the Wheel, and therefore destroy the cycle of birth, futility, meaninglessness, and death it brings (as he sees it).

I don't believe Ishamael turned to the Shadow because he has any special regard for the DO. He turned to the Shadow because his goals coincide with the DO's. Siding with the DO gives him the best opportunity to fulfill his destiny, as he sees it. And, he tries to lure others to the Shadow for the same reason.

Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1632 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 670 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 218 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 717 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 520 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 528 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 443 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 507 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 490 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 421 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 396 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 364 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 365 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 453 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 400 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 552 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 371 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 362 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 452 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 443 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 486 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 431 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 408 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 385 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 363 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 742 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 443 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 430 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 422 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 372 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 369 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 358 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 348 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 351 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 349 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 762 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 351 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 373 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 354 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 172 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 161 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 432 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 495 Views

Reply to Message