Active Users:441 Time:13/12/2025 04:05:09 PM
Impressive newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM
Most impressive.
This is definitely one to give a leisurely read-through and contemplate.
I'd still say that there's an unequivocal wrongness to grabbing men, women, and children, then feeding them to other creatures.

Yet, there are many real world examples of people who steep themselves in High Reason, overlooking various aspects of common sense - or becoming apathetic to violations of natural law (murder, rape, etc).

When Rand spoke with Moridin in TGS, I loved what he said: that, in essence, Ishy was driven mad by reason.
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1845 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 861 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 303 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 886 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 705 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 742 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 634 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 699 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 680 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 617 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 581 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 565 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 550 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 662 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 600 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 745 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 567 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 554 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 658 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 640 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 680 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 639 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 606 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 576 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 548 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1059 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 617 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 611 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 614 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 569 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 596 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 601 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 541 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 551 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 551 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 956 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 535 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 568 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 534 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 254 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 243 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 624 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 727 Views

Reply to Message