I always took it to mean that like many philosophers, it is easier for Ishamael to be distracted by faulty logic because just because something makes sense on paper or when you think about it, doesn't mean it follows in the real world.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 04/03/2010 at 04:47:34 PM
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1797 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 838 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 907 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 664 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 692 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 589 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 642 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 600 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 609 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 610 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 550 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 524 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 570 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 642 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 588 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 565 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 984 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 569 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 519 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 552 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 544 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 498 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 500 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 497 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 913 Views

But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 491 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 522 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 528 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 234 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 498 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM
- 582 Views