What I meant by "could not completely rid the world of evil" was that even if 'dark' Rand beat the Dark One, the world would still not be free of evil. Why would the Seanchan victory be bad? Because they are evil (or at least oppressive). Similarly Rand would cause so much turmoil and sacrifice so much, break the world to a million peices, all for the one goal of fighting the Dark One, that winning would be as bad as losing
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
1845 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
886 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
960 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
705 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
742 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
634 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
680 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
647 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
662 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
660 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
600 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
567 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
611 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
680 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
639 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
606 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing
- 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM
576 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1059 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
614 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
569 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
596 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
601 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
541 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
551 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
551 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
955 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
955 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
535 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
568 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
572 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
252 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
534 Views
