Active Users:825 Time:03/08/2025 05:30:28 PM
OK, within the Mormon context I can see that point. Joel Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 12:33:52 AM
Guess I was the one being hypersensitive this time; sorry, ladies. :<img class=' /> For what it is worth, there are plenty of female Church leaders in the Old and New Testament alike, Pauls rejection of it notwithstanding; Paul is not God. He explicitly makes that point himself prior to one of his admonitions; in some ways the OT canon is a lot more comfortable than the NT because, while one may not agree with that view of it, the OT is always very clear about what is considered divinely inspired (i.e. all of it.) With the NT it is often less clear when an author is speaking as an Apostle of God and when it is just Paul telling a protege to drink some occasional wine for his upset tummy (though I fail to see how that would HELP.)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2500 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1238 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1110 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1120 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1213 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1050 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 672 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1026 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 607 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 660 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 628 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1089 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2113 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1047 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 612 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1158 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 614 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1071 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 995 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1053 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 523 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 745 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 727 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 643 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 573 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 676 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 530 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 863 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 749 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 681 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 715 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 754 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 651 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 791 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 611 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 639 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 670 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 695 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 697 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 663 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 707 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 656 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 782 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 667 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 683 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 595 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 579 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 605 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 614 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 645 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 791 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 687 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 680 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 640 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1234 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1124 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1108 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1091 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 992 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 1011 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1099 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1045 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1070 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1067 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1050 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1143 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1012 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1089 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1174 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1132 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1159 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1334 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1213 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1108 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1303 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1105 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1035 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1142 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1144 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1062 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1130 Views
Yikes. Even for religion, that's more than a little crazy. - 04/10/2011 03:47:56 PM 1127 Views
I don't think there's much of a difference in crazy as opposed to other more mainstream religions. - 04/10/2011 07:08:06 PM 1092 Views
A difference exists if only in continued unabashed affirmation of a rather distasteful doctrine. - 04/10/2011 11:06:51 PM 1078 Views
Then why can't women be priests? Or enter the altar? The curse on Eve is very much in place. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:27:04 AM 585 Views
OK, within the Mormon context I can see that point. - 05/10/2011 12:33:52 AM 1024 Views
They can in quite a few denominations. *NM* - 05/10/2011 06:12:35 AM 635 Views
Whoops! You meant in LDS specifically. My mistake. *NM* - 05/10/2011 06:14:05 AM 601 Views
Right now I am not making an absolute statement but a relative one. - 05/10/2011 08:37:50 PM 889 Views
Yes, that is kind of the problem. - 06/10/2011 12:13:27 AM 1051 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1019 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1055 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1077 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1107 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1026 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1066 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1236 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 566 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1050 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 991 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1235 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1069 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 897 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1031 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1231 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 1008 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1190 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 981 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1093 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1201 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 606 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1237 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1018 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1139 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1071 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1179 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1030 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 687 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1139 Views

Reply to Message