Active Users:869 Time:29/01/2026 08:35:19 AM
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology Larry Send a noteboard - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM
The Catholic Church was most obviously corrupt and venal when Luther nailed his theses to the church door in Wittenberg. The problem is that, by introducing at once Bibles in the vernacular and the sola scriptura method of theology, each splinter group was a poor copy of what preceded it, to the point where one sees heresies particular to America, such as Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons, who aren't even Christians because their copy is so garbled and unusable.


True. The further one gets from the actual schism, the worse it gets. It's hard for me to think of a non-ecclesiastical church as being anything more than an echo chamber where the most ignorant can (and do) view themselves as being as knowledgeable as the presumed leaders.

Christians can try to instruct them as to the error of their ways and the crudeness of their scriptures, but at the end of the day all anyone can do with an unrepentant Mormon is feel sorry for them, sigh, shake your head and just ignore their faith.


Quite true. For me, if there is an organization whose history does not date at the latest to the 6th century, that group's theology (or poor excuse for it) will not interest me. Monophysites and Monohelites are much, much more interesting than Campbellites or Mormons.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2627 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1359 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1209 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1246 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1322 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1155 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 730 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1110 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 660 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 708 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 678 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1191 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2216 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1164 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 669 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1268 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 667 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1182 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 1079 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1166 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 574 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 803 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 800 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 688 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 629 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 734 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 584 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 906 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 802 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 744 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 768 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 806 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 712 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 845 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 663 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 713 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 723 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 736 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 761 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 724 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 765 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 702 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 834 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 722 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 740 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 648 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 628 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 660 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 680 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 689 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 836 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 744 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 735 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 691 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1345 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1227 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1193 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1218 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 1073 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 1129 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1220 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1153 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1193 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1151 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1148 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1252 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1111 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1184 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1297 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1250 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1286 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1443 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1323 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1219 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1429 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1217 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1143 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1241 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1238 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1163 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1235 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1125 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1167 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1208 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1218 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1138 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1191 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1346 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 611 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1158 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 1117 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1365 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1177 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 999 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1122 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1345 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 1103 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1309 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 1111 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1216 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1299 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 664 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1328 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1103 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1246 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1184 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1281 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1128 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 736 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1248 Views

Reply to Message