Active Users:1311 Time:02/11/2025 12:01:49 PM
Tempting as it is to prove Joel wrong (since he so frequently is), I need to take issue with this. Tom Send a noteboard - 07/10/2011 06:59:13 PM
The heresy known as Monophysitism was a reaction to the Nestorian heresy and postdates Nicaea. However, the doctrine of Monophysitism certainly predates it. In some cases, such as with the Docetics, the concept that Christ had only a divine nature is taken to an extreme, and Christ was seen as something of a hologram. The Basilidians also believed this, and held that Simon of Cyrene took his place on the cross. Valentinians believed in a physical Jesus but he was not "human", merely divine.

It is telling that these doctrines were current in Egypt in particular (see C. Wilfred Griggs, Early Egyptian Christianity, which charts the theological debates quite well, or one of the many books on gnosticism).

The Egyptians can call themselves miaphysites, but in reality this position was a veil cast by the Egyptian hierarchy to cover popular monophysitism.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2563 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1308 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1165 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1182 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1269 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1112 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 706 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1076 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 635 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 687 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 661 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1138 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2166 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1107 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 643 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1217 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 647 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1141 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 1039 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1112 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 552 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 783 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 775 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 666 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 600 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 705 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 557 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 888 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 783 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 709 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 747 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 783 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 686 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 822 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 642 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 682 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 699 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 718 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 734 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 692 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 740 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 680 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 807 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 697 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 712 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 624 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 606 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 636 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 662 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 671 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 810 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 720 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 705 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 679 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1298 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1191 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1159 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1165 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 1043 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 1082 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1164 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1102 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1123 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1116 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1106 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1192 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1073 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1146 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1243 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1206 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1237 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1403 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1278 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1166 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1383 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1166 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1088 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1192 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1196 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1110 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1188 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1075 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1116 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1163 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1170 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1093 Views
It it is nigh impossible to be a "non-Nicene Christian." - 04/10/2011 03:12:06 PM 1184 Views
I think we've had this discussion before. - 06/10/2011 05:54:39 PM 1176 Views
Arianism is a bad comparison for arguing LDS=Christian. - 06/10/2011 11:45:36 PM 1074 Views
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM 1404 Views
Tempting as it is to prove Joel wrong (since he so frequently is), I need to take issue with this. - 07/10/2011 06:59:13 PM 1144 Views
I was just saying there were competing views. - 07/10/2011 07:49:26 PM 1533 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1143 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1299 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 593 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1108 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 1063 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1308 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1123 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 950 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1079 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1295 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 1060 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1261 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 1060 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1156 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1259 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 637 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1288 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1060 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1194 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1131 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1236 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1079 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 718 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1197 Views

Reply to Message