Active Users:495 Time:01/10/2025 07:48:32 AM
What word do the Prophets use for Israels relationship to God? Joel Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 12:38:20 AM
There's a clear difference. First, Jesus used the term "bridegroom" as an allegory, and the term "bridegroom" and "bride" are totally different in all the relevant languages from "husband" and "wife". In Coptic that would require using "šeleet" instead of "(s)hime" (the "s" appearing in some dialects, not in others).

They often used the same allegory, after all. I know there is a distinction between "bride" and "wife," but my point is the far more significant one between metaphor and literalism: If the newly found text speaks only metaphorically, whether the term is "bride" or "wife" changes little; neither gives legends of a literal wife any credibility.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 20/09/2012 at 12:40:01 AM
Reply to message
So, about this silly "Jesus' wife" story making the rounds... - 19/09/2012 10:55:55 PM 1359 Views
That's right! Jesus' position on marriage was "One man, no woman." *NM* - 19/09/2012 11:05:55 PM 674 Views
What is the context? The canonical bible says Christ has a wife: The Church. - 19/09/2012 11:25:19 PM 990 Views
Oh please...don't confuse "wife" with "bride" - 19/09/2012 11:35:09 PM 959 Views
What word do the Prophets use for Israels relationship to God? - 20/09/2012 12:38:20 AM 936 Views
BRIDE - 20/09/2012 03:39:30 PM 925 Views
Two things why it is important - 20/09/2012 04:24:37 AM 914 Views
There is a very good reason no one dismissed the illegitmate gospels as illegitimate until 180 AD: - 20/09/2012 09:15:05 PM 880 Views
The Gospel of Thomas was written before 180 AD. - 20/09/2012 09:33:44 PM 870 Views
What is the oldest extant text of or reference to it? - 20/09/2012 11:11:03 PM 944 Views
The Oxyrhynchus fragments were dated to c. 200 AD, and they are copies - 21/09/2012 12:18:33 AM 877 Views
I would buy 200 AD, of course. - 21/09/2012 12:58:32 AM 925 Views
It's not about "buying" it - it's essentially proven at that point. - 21/09/2012 03:26:50 AM 905 Views
Yes; all I meant was that I never disputed a date around 200 AD. - 22/09/2012 12:25:41 AM 913 Views
I don't think any of the gospels were written by their purported authors. - 22/09/2012 03:36:32 AM 826 Views
Not even Mark or Luke? - 22/09/2012 01:21:24 PM 885 Views
Well, but everyone knew Peter didn't speak Greek - 22/09/2012 09:46:57 PM 819 Views
What about those who postulate a mid-to-late 1st century composition? - 22/09/2012 02:21:18 AM 936 Views
Elaine Pagels ceased to be an impartial academic a long time ago. - 22/09/2012 03:41:41 AM 895 Views
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well - 22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM 1039 Views
Let's not get started on Funk - 22/09/2012 09:48:05 PM 834 Views
So true - 22/09/2012 10:23:08 PM 934 Views
don't these people have anything better to do? - 20/09/2012 11:39:35 PM 936 Views
Clearly not. - 22/09/2012 12:27:29 AM 771 Views
then i'll escape this thread before anyone twigs - 22/09/2012 08:12:37 PM 1010 Views
Too late, I have already twigged, branched and treed. - 22/09/2012 08:58:39 PM 914 Views
I know! - 21/09/2012 06:48:33 AM 1128 Views
See, Tom, you made a mistake. - 22/09/2012 10:25:22 AM 907 Views

Reply to Message