Active Users:1728 Time:02/08/2026 12:21:52 PM
Re: For the record... beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM

My guess is the school board was probably sympathetic toward her, and simply was trying to take the pragmatic compromise approach because they viewed having the prom as more important and didn't want to interject politics into a major traditional and highly important social event, when faced on both sides by people more interested politics and winning their battle than letting children have their emotional important event, they chose to cancel the whole thing. Not sure I agree with that either, but I can't demonize them for it.


Well... it'd have been even easier to just go "Whatever, we don't care that you want to bring a girl to the prom."

Say there was going to be a parade that had the rule "No Blacks Allowed." Details don't matter, but inevitable outrage, legal action, whatever ensue, and the parade is given a choice: Either go through with the parade and withstand massive negative PR, or just stop being bastards and let them march.

Or... they can throw a hissy fit, go "We'd rather NO ONE march then let one single foot darker than my tan touch the pavement."


The school took option 3 in this case.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date - 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM 1921 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM 322 Views
Not ALL of the US. There were same-sex couples at my prom. *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:26:24 AM 367 Views
Yeah, don't worry, I know it's not like that everywhere. - 12/03/2010 09:15:43 AM 740 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage. - 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM 1003 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM 830 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM 837 Views
Ummmm.... no. - 12/03/2010 11:02:50 PM 850 Views
i totally agree 100% with what you're saying - 12/03/2010 02:33:55 AM 964 Views
What??? - 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM 925 Views
Actually... - 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM 928 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense. - 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM 839 Views
That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM 897 Views
Er... - 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM 779 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM 845 Views
... - 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM 769 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt." - 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM 785 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that. - 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM 835 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say? - 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM 734 Views
Again, you're right. - 12/03/2010 03:59:13 PM 703 Views
Yup. - 12/03/2010 04:02:26 PM 808 Views
Not really. Her point is that they should both be illegal. - 12/03/2010 07:01:47 PM 739 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM 792 Views
And when the school refused to change it's policy... - 12/03/2010 03:25:03 PM 730 Views
Absurd. - 12/03/2010 08:27:19 PM 811 Views
The rules were unjust. - 13/03/2010 05:09:59 AM 842 Views
Wow, talk about proving my point! - 12/03/2010 11:04:34 PM 952 Views
So hang on. - 13/03/2010 05:04:58 AM 830 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong. - 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM 804 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO - 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM 862 Views
Maybe. - 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM 863 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM 781 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 01:53:39 PM 809 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 03:04:43 PM 770 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here. - 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM 763 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt... - 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM 829 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM 797 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM 795 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under - 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM 682 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under - 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM 837 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux" - 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM 731 Views
Your comments are inconsistent - 15/03/2010 02:09:43 AM 789 Views
I think you're optimistic about what her chances would've been - 12/03/2010 07:13:38 PM 785 Views
For the record... - 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM 790 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM 836 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM 850 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM 814 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit? - 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM 786 Views
Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 01:46:23 PM 788 Views
Re: Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 07:25:41 PM 874 Views
I have issues with both sides, I think - 12/03/2010 02:44:06 PM 754 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend - 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM 911 Views
Another thing I think people should remember - - 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM 901 Views
One point though - 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM 821 Views
Re: One point though - 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM 889 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance - 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM 724 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much? - 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM 687 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else - 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM 750 Views
It does - 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM 735 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM 676 Views
I typically agree with you - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM 790 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM 734 Views
yah, but at this point, how much of it is the girl? - 13/03/2010 10:24:57 PM 696 Views
Is she a child or an adult? IIRC she's 18 - 13/03/2010 11:33:39 PM 750 Views
No, it should not - 14/03/2010 12:33:56 AM 949 Views
Re: No, it should not - 14/03/2010 01:16:33 AM 863 Views
I understood that. You explained it well. *NM* - 14/03/2010 03:28:10 AM 342 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM 786 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM 674 Views
This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 04:27:43 AM 823 Views
Re: This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 05:18:11 AM 1064 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM 777 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM 690 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM 891 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:11:11 AM 788 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 03:42:06 AM 821 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:47:47 AM 836 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 04:09:18 AM 801 Views
You make good points. *NM* - 15/03/2010 08:08:37 PM 313 Views
Ah, yes, "the rules." - 15/03/2010 01:47:31 AM 729 Views
Read my replies to Nossy and Ghavrel - 15/03/2010 05:01:29 AM 796 Views
Slippery slope arguments are stupid. - 14/03/2010 12:43:00 AM 676 Views
So is likening everythng back to the Civil Rights Movement - 14/03/2010 04:17:54 AM 834 Views
"Dress codes exists for a reason?" - 15/03/2010 01:43:36 AM 735 Views
They do - 15/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 855 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM* - 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM 495 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened - 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM 674 Views
Teenaged lesbians - 15/03/2010 06:55:12 AM 789 Views

Reply to Message