Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
Isaac Send a noteboard - 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
Legally speaking schools basically have leeway to enforce any dress code so long as they apply it evenly and can demonstrate they are not deliberately being selective in application. I guess a case could be made that if they had a dress code stipulating suits for males and dresses/skirts for females they'd have a pretty solid case.
Isn't that discriminating on the basis of gender? Girls have to wear dresses and boys have to wear tuxedos? I have a problem with that.
There is nothing even about that code. It sounds blatantly selective in application to me.
IIRC, girls skirts boys pants is a perfectly legal dress code, my personal opinion on the matter not withstanding it's definitely legal for a school to have one, or by now the ACLU would have sued the pants off a number of schools, no pun intended, and I believe even private schools would be subject to that sort of case were it not legal. People have a lot of incorrect impression about laws on this stuff anyway. You can in many cases discriminate entirely legally on gender, men don't have to wear shirts on their front lawn, women do. Women don't have to register for the draft, men do, etc.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date
- 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM
1804 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM
290 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM
925 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM
756 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM
757 Views
What???
- 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM
829 Views
Actually...
- 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM
848 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense.
- 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM
769 Views
That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM
824 Views
Er...
- 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM
703 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM
770 Views
...
- 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM
689 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt."
- 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM
705 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that.
- 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM
758 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say?
- 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM
647 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM
709 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong.
- 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM
740 Views
Re: This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 02:31:06 PM
785 Views
Why don't you show me where I said marriage is holy OR made a religious argument, you imbecile?
- 12/03/2010 10:32:42 PM
750 Views
actually, i thought i read that it was because she wanted to wear a tux instead of a dress
- 12/03/2010 02:46:00 AM
776 Views
Kind of a different can of worms then
- 12/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
712 Views
What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 14/03/2010 01:24:47 AM
709 Views
Hmm. Apparently it is legal to discriminate upon the basis of gender. Imagine that.
- 14/03/2010 02:45:51 AM
689 Views
It kind of makes sense, given the highly arbitrary and stereotypical nature of gender.
- 14/03/2010 03:35:44 AM
625 Views
Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
745 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO
- 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM
780 Views
Maybe.
- 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM
780 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters"
- 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM
704 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here.
- 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM
684 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt...
- 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM
746 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM
719 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM
713 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under
- 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM
607 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under
- 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
761 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux"
- 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM
651 Views
For the record...
- 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM
696 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM
744 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM
760 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM
733 Views
No no, I know how you feel. I'm just disinclined to have sympathy for the school.
- 12/03/2010 11:28:35 PM
606 Views
Alternatively, I have little sympathy for the school, I just don't have much for her either
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
724 Views
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
724 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit?
- 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM
706 Views
Regardless of "rights" invovled, I don't see why she shouldn't be able to go as she pleases.
- 12/03/2010 05:25:31 PM
751 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend
- 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM
828 Views
Another thing I think people should remember -
- 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM
826 Views
One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM
751 Views
Re: One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM
814 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance
- 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM
637 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much?
- 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM
614 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else
- 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM
674 Views
It does
- 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM
657 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM
610 Views
I typically agree with you
- 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM
714 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM
652 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM
713 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM
590 Views
He wasn't neccessarily advocating it. He was translating what they were doing into something that
- 16/03/2010 01:37:59 AM
680 Views
I'd argue that that kind of hypocrisy is invaluable in today's world, actually.
- 16/03/2010 01:46:16 AM
655 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM
687 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
609 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM
804 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM*
- 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM
456 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened
- 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM
597 Views
