Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
Isaac Send a noteboard - 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
Legally speaking schools basically have leeway to enforce any dress code so long as they apply it evenly and can demonstrate they are not deliberately being selective in application. I guess a case could be made that if they had a dress code stipulating suits for males and dresses/skirts for females they'd have a pretty solid case.
Isn't that discriminating on the basis of gender? Girls have to wear dresses and boys have to wear tuxedos? I have a problem with that.
There is nothing even about that code. It sounds blatantly selective in application to me.
IIRC, girls skirts boys pants is a perfectly legal dress code, my personal opinion on the matter not withstanding it's definitely legal for a school to have one, or by now the ACLU would have sued the pants off a number of schools, no pun intended, and I believe even private schools would be subject to that sort of case were it not legal. People have a lot of incorrect impression about laws on this stuff anyway. You can in many cases discriminate entirely legally on gender, men don't have to wear shirts on their front lawn, women do. Women don't have to register for the draft, men do, etc.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date
- 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM
1866 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM
299 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM
946 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM
780 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM
783 Views
What???
- 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM
863 Views
Actually...
- 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM
871 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense.
- 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM
788 Views
That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM
850 Views
Er...
- 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM
724 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM
791 Views
...
- 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM
719 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt."
- 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM
732 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that.
- 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM
782 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say?
- 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM
681 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM
739 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong.
- 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM
760 Views
Re: This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 02:31:06 PM
803 Views
Why don't you show me where I said marriage is holy OR made a religious argument, you imbecile?
- 12/03/2010 10:32:42 PM
773 Views
actually, i thought i read that it was because she wanted to wear a tux instead of a dress
- 12/03/2010 02:46:00 AM
801 Views
Kind of a different can of worms then
- 12/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
749 Views
What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 14/03/2010 01:24:47 AM
732 Views
Hmm. Apparently it is legal to discriminate upon the basis of gender. Imagine that.
- 14/03/2010 02:45:51 AM
718 Views
It kind of makes sense, given the highly arbitrary and stereotypical nature of gender.
- 14/03/2010 03:35:44 AM
649 Views
Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
767 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO
- 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM
807 Views
Maybe.
- 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM
804 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters"
- 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM
724 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here.
- 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM
711 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt...
- 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM
774 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM
752 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM
742 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under
- 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM
629 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under
- 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
787 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux"
- 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM
672 Views
For the record...
- 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM
731 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM
772 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM
792 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM
761 Views
No no, I know how you feel. I'm just disinclined to have sympathy for the school.
- 12/03/2010 11:28:35 PM
632 Views
Alternatively, I have little sympathy for the school, I just don't have much for her either
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
746 Views
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
746 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit?
- 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM
729 Views
Regardless of "rights" invovled, I don't see why she shouldn't be able to go as she pleases.
- 12/03/2010 05:25:31 PM
779 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend
- 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM
852 Views
Another thing I think people should remember -
- 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM
849 Views
One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM
772 Views
Re: One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM
831 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance
- 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM
664 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much?
- 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM
634 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else
- 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM
699 Views
It does
- 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM
684 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM
630 Views
I typically agree with you
- 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM
736 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM
678 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM
738 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM
617 Views
He wasn't neccessarily advocating it. He was translating what they were doing into something that
- 16/03/2010 01:37:59 AM
698 Views
I'd argue that that kind of hypocrisy is invaluable in today's world, actually.
- 16/03/2010 01:46:16 AM
684 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM
721 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
636 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM
831 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM*
- 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM
470 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened
- 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM
622 Views
