the robert adams reviews are interesting. clearly, he hated the story in general, which lead him to skim over a lot of the detail, which in turn made him misunderstand important things (or miss them completely).
this made the reviews kind of silly because at this point, he's not really reviewing, just slagging.
still, one thing did resonate truly for me in his review of winter's heart and it's something that's been my major beef with the books in general.
it's like watching the highway chase scene in matrix2, where the two trucks drive toward each other with morpheus and the key guy on top. except instead of seeing them hit and being treated to a neato CG slow motion explosion and neo swooping in to save the day, the trucks just keep driving past each other, turning around, and coming back again, only to pass by once more.
it's probably why most people hate perrin. it's not that perrin sucks, but that his story was stuck in limbo for so long, seeming to be coming close to a resolution, only to spiral away from the inevitable collision at the last second.
i've seen many people say they liked tGS and ToM more than RJ's own books and i shake my head.
but then i remember that i enjoyed sanderson's additions more too. that's in spite of him completely botching up the pacing and generally writing with a sledgehammer.
it's not at all that sanderson is good, it's that he got to write the book(s) where all the best stuff happens.
mmm, so looking back on this post, i seem to have strayed off topic. but in general, i'm mostly just underlining the fact that enjoying the story != enjoying the writing. or something. ¬_¬
this made the reviews kind of silly because at this point, he's not really reviewing, just slagging.
still, one thing did resonate truly for me in his review of winter's heart and it's something that's been my major beef with the books in general.
The aim, in other words, is precisely the necrophilic jouissance of postponement, an endless deferral, a tantric-sex approach to narrative satisfaction.
it's like watching the highway chase scene in matrix2, where the two trucks drive toward each other with morpheus and the key guy on top. except instead of seeing them hit and being treated to a neato CG slow motion explosion and neo swooping in to save the day, the trucks just keep driving past each other, turning around, and coming back again, only to pass by once more.
it's probably why most people hate perrin. it's not that perrin sucks, but that his story was stuck in limbo for so long, seeming to be coming close to a resolution, only to spiral away from the inevitable collision at the last second.
i've seen many people say they liked tGS and ToM more than RJ's own books and i shake my head.
but then i remember that i enjoyed sanderson's additions more too. that's in spite of him completely botching up the pacing and generally writing with a sledgehammer.
it's not at all that sanderson is good, it's that he got to write the book(s) where all the best stuff happens.
mmm, so looking back on this post, i seem to have strayed off topic. but in general, i'm mostly just underlining the fact that enjoying the story != enjoying the writing. or something. ¬_¬
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
- 21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM
3591 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer.
- 21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM
2007 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured
- 22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM
1680 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
- 23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM
1509 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
- 23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM
1589 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
- 21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM
1997 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. *NM*
- 22/02/2011 02:39:20 PM
1165 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
- 22/02/2011 02:41:37 PM
1524 Views
That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen.
- 23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM
1566 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
- 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM
2083 Views
- 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM
2083 Views
Re: I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
- 22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM
1715 Views
- 22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM
1715 Views
That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a channeler.
- 22/02/2011 11:30:52 PM
1566 Views
Re: That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a
- 23/02/2011 12:02:24 AM
1584 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ...
- 22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM
1619 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
- 22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM
2666 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited.
- 22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM
1929 Views
That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
- 23/02/2011 02:15:12 AM
1677 Views
Re: That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
- 23/02/2011 11:02:14 AM
1625 Views
adam roberts reviews
- 23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM
1799 Views
And I suspect those who prefer the BS books are those who largely read WoT for the story. *NM*
- 23/02/2011 08:06:16 AM
1032 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking
- 24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM
1515 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
- 22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM
2051 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
- 22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM
1876 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know.
*NM*
- 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM
954 Views
*NM*
- 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM
954 Views
There are nine, actually...
- 23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM
1812 Views
Lovecraft's Necronomicon was fictitious. If you want to count fanfiction, fine. *NM*
- 23/02/2011 12:38:07 AM
1025 Views
Based on how poorly worded that response was, I'm not sure what to think of it. *NM*
- 23/02/2011 12:13:00 AM
1032 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you.
- 23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM
1453 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you.
- 24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM
1610 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
- 24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM
1559 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
- 24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM
1641 Views
So wait, style is good?
- 25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM
1841 Views
That depends...
- 23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM
1736 Views
I didn't say aesthetics was the primary criterion. I named three criteria.
- 23/02/2011 05:39:03 AM
1622 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion
- 23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM
1576 Views
If you don't mind me asking...
- 24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM
1584 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
- 24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM
1503 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
- 24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM
1531 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
- 25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM
1590 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
- 25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM
1552 Views
...
- 25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM
1446 Views
It is not a serious question.
- 25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM
1659 Views
Is that so?
- 25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM
1848 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan.
- 25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM
1552 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him?
- 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM
1582 Views
You're conflating two things.
- 25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM
1771 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere.
- 26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM
1618 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity.
- 26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM
1421 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM*
- 26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM
906 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered.
- 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM
1674 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
- 25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM
1736 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
- 25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM
2016 Views
I'm not wasting my time proving something to an internet moron and troll like you.
- 25/02/2011 07:36:19 PM
1471 Views
Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic"
- 28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM
1443 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
- 26/02/2011 11:06:26 AM
1415 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly
- 23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM
1831 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
- 23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM
1444 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
- 23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM
1611 Views
Of course people read for pleasure.
- 23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM
1507 Views
Ok...
- 24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM
1508 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument.
- 24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM
1634 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"?
- 24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM
1624 Views
Among living writers?
- 24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM
1699 Views
My list would be similar...
- 26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM
1791 Views
That was a very good list.
- 26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM
1745 Views
Re: That was a very good list.
- 27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM
1707 Views
Oh, and another question
- 27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM
1313 Views
Re: Oh, and another question
- 01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM
1640 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM
1791 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM
1686 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM
1665 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM
1608 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM*
- 27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM
1053 Views

*NM*