Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
Nargs Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
If you support this idea, why? What prevents it from protecting against bludgeoning?
This message last edited by Nargs on 10/02/2012 at 11:10:49 PM
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
- 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
1755 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
1220 Views
I suppose I am on a...
- 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
1153 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
1246 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
1297 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
- 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
1353 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
- 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
1219 Views
Ummm, Warders...
- 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
1084 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
- 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
1136 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
1018 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1193 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
999 Views
which way is it?
- 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
1012 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
- 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
1119 Views
That's really not my point.
- 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
1016 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
- 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
1102 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
- 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
1072 Views
Not nesecarrily
- 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
1053 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
- 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
1159 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
- 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
1032 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
- 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
987 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1053 Views
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1053 Views
Not accurate
- 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
1124 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
- 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
1102 Views
I disagree
- 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
1056 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
- 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
985 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
- 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
1125 Views
nope
- 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
992 Views
*Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
1159 Views
Re: *Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
1322 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
1118 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
1027 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
998 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
980 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
1178 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
- 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
1013 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
- 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
1185 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
- 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
1036 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
- 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
1021 Views
