Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
But I'll recap the general jist of what was said:
-Cuendillar is presumably completely inflexible, therefore we'd need to make it similar to chain-mail, i.e. links, to make small pieces that are flexible with respect to each other.
-This appears difficult, because the individual cuendillar pieces could not be touching when merged together (although I'm sure they could simply interleave flows of Air and it wouldn't be all that hard).
-The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
-Cuendillar is presumably completely inflexible, therefore we'd need to make it similar to chain-mail, i.e. links, to make small pieces that are flexible with respect to each other.
-This appears difficult, because the individual cuendillar pieces could not be touching when merged together (although I'm sure they could simply interleave flows of Air and it wouldn't be all that hard).
-The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
No, you are wrong. Both scale and fully plate armor would be not only be completely viable but much easier to make than chain. They would also provider protection from not only slashing (like chain mail) but piercing and bludgeoning (as much as any feudal armor can and better than any in history) weapons.
The argument (and that is giving it too much credit) that cuendillar's unbreakable nature would lend to increased damage by blunt force trauma is ridiculous and ignore the very basic tenants of physics.
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
- 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
1646 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
1109 Views
I suppose I am on a...
- 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
1033 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
1141 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
1178 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
- 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
1236 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
- 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
1102 Views
Ummm, Warders...
- 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
950 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
- 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
1013 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
919 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1048 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
885 Views
which way is it?
- 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
899 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
- 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
1002 Views
That's really not my point.
- 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
889 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
- 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
982 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
- 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
946 Views
Not nesecarrily
- 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
932 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
- 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
1046 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
- 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
905 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
- 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
874 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive 
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
916 Views
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
916 Views
Not accurate
- 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
998 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
- 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
980 Views
I disagree
- 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
935 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
- 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
851 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
- 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
995 Views
nope
- 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
869 Views
*Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
1035 Views
Re: *Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
1202 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
961 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
894 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
886 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
859 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
1039 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
- 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
896 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
- 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
1051 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
- 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
906 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
- 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
876 Views