Active Users:2209 Time:18/06/2026 11:29:57 AM
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
Good job. You've demonstrated that you are 20x smarter than your average Aes Sedai.

Of course they can be killed easily using indirect affects of the OP. The indirect affects of the OP are common knowledge even to Mat. The heart of the advancement of warfare is bettering the betterer.

Who would have the advantage between 2 warders with exact same skill/power/speed if one were wearing heartstone armor and the other was wearing the finest non-heartstone armor available and they were both using weapons of choice?
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1756 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1220 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 633 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1153 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1221 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 589 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1129 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1298 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1090 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 634 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1102 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1260 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 554 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1354 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1148 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1133 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1133 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1141 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1219 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1085 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1136 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1018 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1193 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1000 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1012 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1119 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1017 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 989 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 691 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1102 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1073 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1054 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1160 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1033 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 988 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1124 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1103 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1057 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 985 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1125 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 993 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1160 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1322 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1118 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 999 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 981 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1179 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1013 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1015 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1186 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1037 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1022 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1126 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 612 Views

Reply to Message