Active Users:950 Time:06/11/2026 02:17:19 AM
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
I'd assume fireballs and lightning, the most commonly used attacks, would work fine against a Cuendillar armoured target. Fire could seep through all the cracks - which Cuendillar armour would need to have, or else it would fuse together - and then the poor guy would just be cooked from within the armour. And I'm not sure why you say that Cuendillar wouldn't be conductive. Just because it's not damaged by electricity, doesn't mean it can't carry it.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1859 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1307 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 686 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1263 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1319 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 667 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1220 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1400 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1197 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 715 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1195 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1341 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 604 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1456 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1250 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1223 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1221 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1230 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1320 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1185 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1235 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1125 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1297 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1089 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1100 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1230 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1112 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 1078 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 740 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1192 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1190 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1153 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1249 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1121 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 1092 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1230 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1214 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1153 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 1098 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1282 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 1096 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1281 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1422 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1235 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 1092 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 1098 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1273 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1125 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1119 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1275 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1143 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1124 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1254 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 670 Views

Reply to Message