Active Users:691 Time:03/08/2025 05:23:00 AM
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
Standard practices became standard practices because they worked. Virtually all the standard OP battle practices, that we have seen, are indirect. When you use something that you "know" works, you often do not realise when it fails.

C armor would also not nesecarrily be apparent, so channelers would not immediately know they needed to go to more thoughtful tactics (such as blades of air through the eyeslits of a helm). In fact, the average channeler would probably assume that it is just a bunch of White Cloaks and thus without any OP defenses.

If you are used to dispatching a knot of men by waving your hand and sending a giant blade of air at chest height, when it does not work, you may well end up dead before you figure out why.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1531 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 996 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 520 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 916 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1018 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 480 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 891 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1084 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 873 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 520 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 869 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1016 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 446 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1123 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 923 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 903 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 898 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 928 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 976 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 824 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 910 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 796 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 924 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 769 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 792 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 900 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 775 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 766 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 594 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 885 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 835 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 832 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 945 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 778 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 790 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 895 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 873 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 844 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 737 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 853 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 763 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 893 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1052 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 772 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 766 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 930 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 791 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 796 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 963 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 799 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 782 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 828 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 491 Views

Reply to Message