Active Users:333 Time:17/06/2025 12:39:00 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
we witnessed couldn't even make a small cup turn in an hour.

it is my recolection/impression that they were converting goblets, and those can be quite sizable. Especially when you are talking something that started life as cast iron, and it is the volume of the material that is important.

Considering most Warders we've seen don't seem to even wear armor ... They seem to prefer mobility over the protection

You are correct, warders do prefer mobility over carying 200 pounds of armor around, but C armor wouldn't be 200lbs. One of the 2 key advantages of C as a armor material is that it is inherantly unbreakable. paper thin C has the same protective value as C 50 feet thick. Because of this fantastical feature, C armor would/should be incredibly light, Lighter even than the leather that most warders wear now because you do not need thickness for either protection of structural strength.

Why would an Aes Sedai even consider undertaking such a process?

Postponing the agonizing crippling sorrow and longing (from the severed bond) for a dead warder comes to mind.

I'm not saying it would be useless, but there clearly isn't need for such armor as it would only really be effective under certain circumstances.

Circumstances like any time blades are bared, situation warders tend to end up in fairly regularly, or better yet a once in an Age huge battle between good and evil... think we might see one of those?

And really how much more effective would cuendillar armor be compared to steel?

See below, it would be incredibly effective. Same mobility, massive increase in protection. It would be like going into battle bearing live steel, while all your opponents were using lathe practice wands.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1506 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 972 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 509 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 896 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 997 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 468 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 870 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 1018 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1059 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 851 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 505 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 839 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 989 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 436 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1096 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 902 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 876 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 874 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 907 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 957 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 798 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 890 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 760 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 898 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 745 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 768 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 876 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 756 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 744 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 583 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 863 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 806 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 812 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 925 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 758 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 770 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 798 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 875 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 842 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 809 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 714 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 819 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 739 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 867 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1030 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 806 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 741 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 752 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 737 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 893 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 768 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 772 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 942 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 777 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 757 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 810 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 474 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes