Active Users:354 Time:17/06/2025 01:35:35 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
we witnessed couldn't even make a small cup turn in an hour.

it is my recolection/impression that they were converting goblets, and those can be quite sizable. Especially when you are talking something that started life as cast iron, and it is the volume of the material that is important.

Considering most Warders we've seen don't seem to even wear armor ... They seem to prefer mobility over the protection

You are correct, warders do prefer mobility over carying 200 pounds of armor around, but C armor wouldn't be 200lbs. One of the 2 key advantages of C as a armor material is that it is inherantly unbreakable. paper thin C has the same protective value as C 50 feet thick. Because of this fantastical feature, C armor would/should be incredibly light, Lighter even than the leather that most warders wear now because you do not need thickness for either protection of structural strength.

Why would an Aes Sedai even consider undertaking such a process?

Postponing the agonizing crippling sorrow and longing (from the severed bond) for a dead warder comes to mind.

I'm not saying it would be useless, but there clearly isn't need for such armor as it would only really be effective under certain circumstances.

Circumstances like any time blades are bared, situation warders tend to end up in fairly regularly, or better yet a once in an Age huge battle between good and evil... think we might see one of those?

And really how much more effective would cuendillar armor be compared to steel?

See below, it would be incredibly effective. Same mobility, massive increase in protection. It would be like going into battle bearing live steel, while all your opponents were using lathe practice wands.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1506 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 973 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 509 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 897 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 998 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 468 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 871 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 1019 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1060 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 852 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 505 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 840 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 989 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 436 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1097 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 903 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 877 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 875 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 908 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 958 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 799 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 891 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 761 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 899 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 746 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 769 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 876 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 756 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 745 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 583 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 864 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 807 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 812 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 926 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 759 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 771 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 799 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 876 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 843 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 810 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 714 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 820 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 740 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 868 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1031 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 806 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 742 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 753 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 738 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 894 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 769 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 773 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 943 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 778 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 758 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 811 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 474 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes