Active Users:337 Time:17/06/2025 12:23:37 PM
I disagree darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
Even a very large goblet is still going to be smaller than a breastplate or such for armor ... No matter how thin. And we have no clue how much cuendillar would weigh. Even if it is incredibly light it will still hinder mobility compared to leather etc as it does not have flexibility. No matter how you look at it armor reduces mobility, and that can be fatal in a melee ... As others have pointed out there are still gaps in even the best armor and realistically no armor will protect against channelers. Maybe a nice ceremonial suit of armor for the King or the Amyrlins Warder would be cool, no matter how you spin it the advantages just aren't really there.

If you want "out of the box" and you are going to use cuendillar as a defense I would think it would be smarter to coat a cities walls with it or something along those lines ... Having literally unbreakable walls or gates would be far more beneficial than a few suits of armor that may or may not give a handful of warriors an advantage against a Trolloc.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1506 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 972 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 509 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 896 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 997 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 468 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 869 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1059 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 851 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 505 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 838 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 989 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 436 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1096 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 902 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 876 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 874 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 907 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 957 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 798 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 890 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 760 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 898 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 745 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 768 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 876 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 756 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 744 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 583 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 863 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 806 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 812 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 925 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 758 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 770 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 874 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 841 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 809 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 714 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 819 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 738 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 867 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1030 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 752 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 737 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 892 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 768 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 771 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 942 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 777 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 757 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 809 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 474 Views

Reply to Message