Active Users:335 Time:02/05/2025 09:10:33 AM
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
Only a handful benefit from them and more power to them if they choose to use armor, but given the lack of more than a slightly better set of armor the energy IMO would be better spent elsewhere.

Realistically cuendillar armor won't give much advantage over regular steel unless weapons are also being made of cuendillar (also a better use of resource IMO). Cuendillar armor won't keep you alive from an OP attack, won't help you against a canon shot and won't prevent a better warrior from chopping your head off. It's not like it's some "magic" armor ... It's just made from a superior material, advantage yes, but is it going to make a world of difference on a mass scale ... Very doubtful. Armor is armor.

If they are going to mass produce things from cuendillar there are more effective ways to put the resource to use. With canons in place city walls are far more vulnerable than in the past. With cuendillar walls canons are useless in a siege ... Not that Traveling doesn't make walls irrelevant, but then using cuendillar for any of these purposes seems silly since it's also impossible to adapt something once it's made.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1494 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 955 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 504 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 862 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 962 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 461 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 851 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1047 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 836 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 500 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 820 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 965 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 431 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1024 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 889 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 863 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 859 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 893 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 939 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 786 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 866 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 748 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 885 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 733 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 753 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 862 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 742 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 730 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 576 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 848 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 793 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 799 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 907 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 742 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 760 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 860 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 831 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 795 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 701 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 808 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 721 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 852 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1017 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 738 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 720 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 873 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 754 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 755 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 924 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 743 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 733 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 791 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 467 Views

Reply to Message