Active Users:414 Time:17/09/2025 03:08:24 PM
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
I'm not exactly thinking hard about these things. They all seem pretty logical and simple to me. Pulling the earth out from under a group of soldiers already sounds like a fantastic idea to me.


Earth is one of the powers that is weakest in females, and nobody, in 13 books, has ever done it. That is what I mean by creating new tactics. Even easier is to open a gateway to 1,000 feet straight up over the command post of your enemies and turn them into artillery for your side. However, nobody in Randland is doing anything like that.

Like I said, C armored troops would be much more effective, and more resistant to the OP battlefield tactics that have been used to date than the current forces.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1560 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1022 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 539 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 947 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1040 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 498 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 929 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1105 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 894 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 536 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 898 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1039 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 459 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1160 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 957 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 928 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 932 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 959 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1005 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 856 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 926 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 835 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 954 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 794 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 822 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 926 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 800 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 790 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 606 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 907 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 861 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 851 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 977 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 802 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 815 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 848 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 928 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 914 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 879 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 762 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 898 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 788 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 928 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1078 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 801 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 785 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 955 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 819 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 829 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 986 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 817 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 810 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 852 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 511 Views

Reply to Message