Active Users:204 Time:18/05/2024 10:11:59 AM
I rest my case. Nargs Send a noteboard - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM
This thread generated more discussion than the original thread.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1331 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 780 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 417 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 685 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 768 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 374 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 668 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 881 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 671 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 419 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 663 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 763 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 351 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 845 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 716 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 686 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 689 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 732 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 783 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 624 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 666 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 591 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 732 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 571 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 583 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 674 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 578 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 573 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 496 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 663 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 612 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 631 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 729 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 580 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 592 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 667 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 670 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 631 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 536 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 673 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 542 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 671 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 848 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 578 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 538 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 688 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 582 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 584 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 740 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 582 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 553 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 620 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 392 Views

Reply to Message