the discussion the previous year barely had 20 posts in it.
This one has reached over 50. Nuff said. Bite me.
This one has reached over 50. Nuff said. Bite me.
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
- 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
1729 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
1198 Views
I suppose I am on a...
- 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
1126 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
1223 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
1269 Views
See?
- 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM
1076 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
- 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
1331 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
- 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
1197 Views
Ummm, Warders...
- 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
1059 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
- 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
1105 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
996 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1156 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
975 Views
which way is it?
- 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
982 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
- 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
1096 Views
That's really not my point.
- 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
992 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
- 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
1072 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
- 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
1046 Views
Not nesecarrily
- 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
1029 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
- 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
1131 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
- 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
1006 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
- 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
958 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1028 Views
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1028 Views
Not accurate
- 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
1095 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
- 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
1068 Views
I disagree
- 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
1028 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
- 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
959 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
- 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
1093 Views
nope
- 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
966 Views
*Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
1132 Views
Re: *Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
1288 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
1088 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
997 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
972 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
947 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
1147 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
- 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
990 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
- 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
1157 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
- 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
1007 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
- 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
973 Views
