Active Users:830 Time:18/08/2026 04:54:56 AM
So what's your conclusion? Shannow Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM
The bell curve is not a hypothesis. It is fact. Your failure to understand this is at the root of your completely outdated strength list.


Brandon even told me at signing (well, rather the guy beside me who had asked him that) he'd seen the graphs RJ made in the notes...

RJ obviously used this as a tool to loosely distribute larger groups of characters.

There probably is an higher percentage of rarer strengths on both sides among WO and WF, simply because the ability is more common among them (they've not culled out the female gene pool among sparkers the way AS have done, and both group marry and have children).

For the rest, all evidence points to strength coming exclusively from the soul (what happened to Lanfear, discrediting the hypothesis it was a body issue ought to put that debate to rest. There's no oddity with Rand, nor with any of the transmigrated Forsaken who all have their exact old strength), so the bell curve would be very close to the AOL's, but in practice I'm guessing it would be very different as the percentage of women whose ability is found is incredibly low (tens of thousand aren't found in the Westlands alone), and the ability is less present in various groups because of culling. I suck at statistics, but my feeling is that the sample among AS at least is probably so small in comparison to Westlands women with the ability, that how the women get found is so random (relying massively on women deciding to go being tested... and they have such a small window of opportunity to make that decision...) there would be tons of aberrations, for e.g. for a few hundreds years, on a sample of only 1000 women, very few subjects with the rare strengths might show up at all.

How come women of Graendal's strength are so rare? Well, how many Graendal are there supposed to be anyway, in the current overall human population? A few hundreds, thousands, less?

We have no idea how big the SF population is, the Aiel are numerous. Those are the only two groups who find and train all their women, but both would have a lower percentage of channellers being born than in the AOL, as they cull male sparkers. In the Westlands it's worse thanks to AS culling out both male and female sparkers.

In Seanchan, they're also culling out male and female sparkers, and even more thoroughly than in the Westlands as all damane are found. The majority of their channelers, however, are never found (as channelers... they become sul'dam instead).

It would mean women in the rarer levels (high and low) would show and most of them are never found. Occasionally, a few of those would show up, like Talaan or the strongest WO.

Finally, there's a factor that is too overlooked: the Pattern.

It's rather obvious the White Tower has been "managed" by the Wheel. If its numbers have dwindled, and its average strength plummet, it's obviously in preparation for the LB. Souls have been kept in reserve for the LB era. It's no coincidence Siuan, Elaida, Aviendha, Elayne, Egwene, Nyaneve, Cadsuane, Moiraine all have the proper strengths to play their roles. The WT has lacked strong recruits for many hundreds years, and suddenly they return... tons of novices above average, some like Sharina from the very rare levels etc. The SF has some too, the Seanchan (like Alivia), the WO. All at the right time.

Let's not forget the Shadow once had 50% of all channellers and nearly won. It's no coincidence the current crop of channelers were extremely unattractive to the Shadow, if they had showed up and too early, Forsaken like Be'lal, Moghedien and Graendal would have snatched them up and train them as weapon, the Generals would have been more tempted to recruit and train, Ishamael would have put a lot more efforts into converting channelers to the Shadow. Etc. The whole "it's not worth it, too much work to train properly such women, not enough angreal to provide them decent strength" factors must have played out to an extent (instead of training them as fighters, Moridin used the BA as a political organ, not worrying overly about strength and training etc.).



Is Moiraine half as strong as Lanfear?
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 3235 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 942 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 1136 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1442 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 1610 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 1091 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 1373 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1727 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1383 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1465 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1424 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1436 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 1399 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 1291 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 1455 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 850 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1513 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 1258 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1623 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 1210 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 1354 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 1320 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 1334 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 1415 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 1361 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 1440 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 1353 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 1321 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 1240 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 1292 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 1281 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 1208 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 1339 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 1300 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 1520 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 1389 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 1387 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 1598 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 1143 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 1245 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 1387 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 1162 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 1169 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 1159 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 1362 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 1136 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 1266 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 1340 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 1131 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 1376 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 1108 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 1148 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 1101 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 1391 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 1258 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 1154 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 1396 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 1217 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 1235 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 1207 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1666 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 1238 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 1323 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 1186 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 1192 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 1188 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 1295 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 1136 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 1175 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 1170 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 1317 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 1345 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 1165 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 1135 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 1133 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 1134 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 1390 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 1125 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 1186 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 1189 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 1387 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 1096 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 1216 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 1168 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 1189 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 1302 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 1145 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 1170 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 1145 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 1092 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 1164 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1819 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 1250 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 1278 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 1163 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 1361 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 1189 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 1335 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 1202 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 1148 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 1330 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 1284 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 1168 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 1265 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 1188 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 1208 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 1143 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 1168 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 1170 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 1310 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 1359 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 840 Views

Reply to Message