Active Users:539 Time:19/03/2026 01:52:19 AM
Wait! Datakim Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
Wait!

I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.

That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.

We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1802 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1212 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1206 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1220 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1131 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 1041 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1120 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 1035 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 1021 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 997 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 1001 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 951 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 987 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 969 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1089 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 989 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1092 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 1008 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1066 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 994 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1064 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 959 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1096 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1099 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 1057 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1134 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 934 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1086 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 525 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 988 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 1003 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 969 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 532 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 935 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 528 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 968 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 924 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1071 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 1029 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 1026 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 1024 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 1030 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 1009 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1073 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 964 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1070 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 912 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 1011 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 985 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 1007 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 1011 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 937 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 1022 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 987 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 911 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1070 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 1028 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 1030 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 967 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 1003 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 908 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 926 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1098 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 931 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 933 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 1032 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 999 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 989 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1066 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 914 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 966 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 1022 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 948 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1097 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1066 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 994 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 1032 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 930 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1067 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 1009 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 1011 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 946 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 1023 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1198 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1332 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 909 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 939 Views

Reply to Message