In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.
Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.
Not irrelevant at all. If I recall, some things aren't just all about out and out brute strength with the OP. It takes the two halves of the OP working together to accomplish the greatest feats. That's why there were two CK and an access key for each. And the CK weren't simply made for creating balefire, but for resealing the DO's prison, only that effort fell apart when the CK were lost into Shadow territory during the war.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1596 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
994 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
831 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
953 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
866 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
836 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
789 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
909 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
816 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
879 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
760 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
854 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
792 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
807 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1266 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
902 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
801 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
412 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
807 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
449 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
755 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
871 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
795 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
831 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
823 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
810 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
809 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
828 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
784 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
765 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
739 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
839 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
725 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
800 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
807 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
820 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
763 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
834 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
765 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
709 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
886 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
821 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
797 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
895 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
742 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
746 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
825 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
769 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
802 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
745 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
751 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
815 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
755 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
899 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions 
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
853 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
853 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
810 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
841 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
735 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
844 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
830 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
751 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
826 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
830 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
745 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1055 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
783 Views