In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.
Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.
Not irrelevant at all. If I recall, some things aren't just all about out and out brute strength with the OP. It takes the two halves of the OP working together to accomplish the greatest feats. That's why there were two CK and an access key for each. And the CK weren't simply made for creating balefire, but for resealing the DO's prison, only that effort fell apart when the CK were lost into Shadow territory during the war.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1940 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1406 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1195 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1282 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1184 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1170 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1140 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1142 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1233 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1156 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1244 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1196 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1212 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1141 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1216 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1657 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1242 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1269 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
605 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1145 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
609 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
1084 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1227 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1197 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1177 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1171 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1185 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1154 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1284 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1110 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1101 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
1069 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1260 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
1106 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1130 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1143 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1161 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1097 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1176 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1138 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
1058 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1208 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1193 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1202 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1249 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
1099 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
1076 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1179 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1147 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1136 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
1060 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1106 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1198 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1090 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1255 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions 
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1206 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1206 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1134 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1194 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
1091 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1211 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1157 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1109 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1160 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1209 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1084 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1381 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1131 Views