In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.
Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.
Not irrelevant at all. If I recall, some things aren't just all about out and out brute strength with the OP. It takes the two halves of the OP working together to accomplish the greatest feats. That's why there were two CK and an access key for each. And the CK weren't simply made for creating balefire, but for resealing the DO's prison, only that effort fell apart when the CK were lost into Shadow territory during the war.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1663 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1067 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
898 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1022 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
929 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
899 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
851 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
974 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
880 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
952 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
858 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
925 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
859 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
917 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1333 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
964 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
944 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
454 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
874 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
482 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
822 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
934 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
854 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
898 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
891 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
897 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
888 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
912 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
841 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
830 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
804 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
938 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
788 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
863 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
872 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
887 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
833 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
900 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
850 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
784 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
957 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
891 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
877 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
971 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
808 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
816 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
897 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
858 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
864 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
805 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
814 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
880 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
829 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
968 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions 
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
919 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
919 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
867 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
908 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
807 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
914 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
894 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
818 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
897 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
949 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
813 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1121 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
850 Views