Rand doesn't know; even his explanation of why he did this did not include greater knowledge of the mechanism. He just said Graendal was so dangerous that killing innocent souls to get rid of her was worthwhile. He's not the Creator, doesn't understand the higher laws of reality and neither are Nynaeve or Min. Truly, I think Cadsuane hit the nail on the head when she backed Min up - if Rand himself utilized balefire in such a way that reality wa destabilized and the Bore was torn open, it wouldn't matter if the balefired souls would be Reborn in one, two or whatever Turnings of the Wheel RJ specified - the Dark One would have destroyed reality in any case, and it would be Rand's fault.
I mean, technically, carrying your line of argument to it's ultimate conclusion, it wouldn't even matter if you balefired a Forsaken because they would come back, anyway. They'd be removed from the field, but there are quite a lot of twisted entities such as Shaidar Haran or Slayer that technically speaking, are much more difficult for a Third Age channeler to comprehend or deal with.
I basically think, in the context of the overall story, that the WoT world is largely a post-apocalyptic one, and destabilizing the Pattern in any way when it is already frayed to the breaking point is not a good idea.
I mean, technically, carrying your line of argument to it's ultimate conclusion, it wouldn't even matter if you balefired a Forsaken because they would come back, anyway. They'd be removed from the field, but there are quite a lot of twisted entities such as Shaidar Haran or Slayer that technically speaking, are much more difficult for a Third Age channeler to comprehend or deal with.
I basically think, in the context of the overall story, that the WoT world is largely a post-apocalyptic one, and destabilizing the Pattern in any way when it is already frayed to the breaking point is not a good idea.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1618 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 1020 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 854 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 973 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 890 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 858 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 806 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 932 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 838 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 902 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 789 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 883 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 814 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 854 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1284 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 925 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 869 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 426 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 830 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 459 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 777 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 897 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 814 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 854 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 847 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 834 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 830 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 848 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 808 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 789 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 761 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 864 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 751 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 821 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 829 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 842 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 787 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 856 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 786 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 730 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 908 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 844 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 825 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 920 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 763 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 769 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 846 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 791 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 824 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 770 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 775 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 838 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 779 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 924 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 878 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 830 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 863 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 757 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 868 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 847 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 773 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 853 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 856 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 767 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1079 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 805 Views