Active Users:356 Time:30/10/2026 09:44:55 PM
Re: Yes it was. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
Rand doesn't know; even his explanation of why he did this did not include greater knowledge of the mechanism. He just said Graendal was so dangerous that killing innocent souls to get rid of her was worthwhile. He's not the Creator, doesn't understand the higher laws of reality and neither are Nynaeve or Min. Truly, I think Cadsuane hit the nail on the head when she backed Min up - if Rand himself utilized balefire in such a way that reality wa destabilized and the Bore was torn open, it wouldn't matter if the balefired souls would be Reborn in one, two or whatever Turnings of the Wheel RJ specified - the Dark One would have destroyed reality in any case, and it would be Rand's fault.

I mean, technically, carrying your line of argument to it's ultimate conclusion, it wouldn't even matter if you balefired a Forsaken because they would come back, anyway. They'd be removed from the field, but there are quite a lot of twisted entities such as Shaidar Haran or Slayer that technically speaking, are much more difficult for a Third Age channeler to comprehend or deal with.

I basically think, in the context of the overall story, that the WoT world is largely a post-apocalyptic one, and destabilizing the Pattern in any way when it is already frayed to the breaking point is not a good idea.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1940 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1406 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1348 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1387 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1284 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 1196 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1283 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 1185 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 1170 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 1141 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 1143 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 1110 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 1136 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 1129 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1233 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 1157 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1244 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 1198 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1213 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 1142 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1217 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 1117 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1237 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1242 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 1190 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1266 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 1082 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1269 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 605 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 1145 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 1143 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 1110 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 609 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 1085 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 605 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 1128 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 1062 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1227 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 1198 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 1179 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 1171 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 1185 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 1154 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1285 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 1111 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1260 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 1106 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 1163 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 1130 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 1144 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 1161 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 1098 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 1177 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 1139 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 1060 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1208 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 1193 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 1202 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 1100 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 1158 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 1045 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 1069 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1250 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 1101 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 1077 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 1180 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 1147 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 1138 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1205 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 1061 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 1107 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 1199 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 1090 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1256 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1206 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 1134 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 1194 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 1092 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1212 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 1165 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 1157 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 1110 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 1161 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1349 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1470 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 1046 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 1092 Views

Reply to Message