If Balefire doesn't destroy the soul, why then can't the DO lay claim to it?  He is outside of space/time as he is not part of the Pattern so the burning a few seconds/minutes away shouldn't be a problem for him... Seems to me that the soul is simply burned from the Pattern too, and thus no longer accessible to ST.
Actually RJ said that time is indeed an issue.
It is like this. Lets say after you die, your soul leaves on a journey to join the pattern or whatever. This journey takes 5 minutes. Once your soul reaches the destination, it is too late for the DO to get you.
However, the DO is ready, so when you die and your soul leaves your body he is there. He catches your soul before it reaches its destination. It takes him only 2 minutes no notice that you are dead and your soul is on its journey. Plenty of time.
He then implants your soul into a new body. Because you never joined with the pattern (or wherever souls go), you never went through the whole recycling process and still have your mind and memories.
Now lets say I balefire you back 10 minutes. The DO is just hanging around when suddenly, he notices that you are dead (you died 10 minutes ago). He tries to reach for your soul but its too late. Since you died 10 minute ago, your soul already reached the pattern 5 minutes ago and is out of the reach of the DO. He curses the fact that even he cannot step outside of time.
(The times are totally made up btw, this is just a silly example)
Now LTT was not just your average shmuck. He was the greatest channeler alive, highly educated, extremely intelligent. The leader of the whole war. During TGS, LTT and Rand are nearly one. We see that time and again when Rand thinks LTT thoughts. I see no reason why LTT/Rand could not puzzle out that it is indeed TIME that messes the DO up. As it does.
Oh, and I did manage to find the RJ quote which probably explains it better. Here it is:
Robert Jordan Answers: There are definitely time constraints on the Dark One's power to transmigrate a soul. The soul doesn't have to be secured immediately - that is, the Dark One doesn't have to be ready to snatch the soul at the instant of death - but the longer that passes after the death, the less chance that the Dark One will be able to secure the soul. Someone who has been killed with balefire in actuality died before the apparent time of his or her death, and thus the window of opportunity for the Dark One to secure that soul for transmigration is gone before the Dark One can know that the soul must be secured unless the amount of balefire used is very small. Remember that the more balefire is used, the further back the target's thread is burned out of the pattern.
After the soul is secured, then a suitable body must be acquired and stripped of the (former) owner's memory and soul to make way for the favored one. By the way, what constitutes a suitable body from the Dark One's perspective is not that of the recipient. Certainly Aginor would never have chosen to be reincarnated in his, shall we say, less than imposing body, nor would the womanizing Balthamel have chosen to be reincarnated as a beautiful woman. It was only chance that Moridin ended up in a body that is young, fairly good looking and physically imposing. Those things simply don't matter to the Dark One. But the body has to be basically healthy and sound, and neither too young nor too old. After all, the Dark One wants his servants to be effective, and a body that meets those basic requirements is more desirable than one that doesn't. Since there is no stockpile of such bodies, the only way for someone to die and immediately be reincarnated would be a matter of pure chance. That is, the death occurred when a suitable body was on hand for some other reason.
There are a few other limits and constraints, but I won't go into them here, since I may want to use them in the books, and I would rather they come as a surprise if I do.
			Rand the psycho?
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
	        1705 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
			I cannot follow your assumptions.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
	        1109 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
	        929 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
	        1046 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
	        955 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
	        944 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Wait!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
	        884 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
	        1004 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
	        907 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
	        983 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
	        911 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
	        967 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
	        903 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
	        961 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
	    
	         - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
	        1386 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Rand crossed a line
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
	        1002 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
			Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
	        980 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
	        477 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			But not in this turning of the Wheel.  So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
	        909 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
	        493 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			LOL ... super-death!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
	        845 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
	        980 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
	        904 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
	        932 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Yes it was.
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
	        930 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			let me ask the question in a different way
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
	        920 Views
	        
	
		
		
	
		
	    		
			Re: let me ask the question in a different way
		
	         - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
	        918 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			actually that quote supports my thoughts
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
	        962 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
	        870 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
	        867 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
	        830 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
	        984 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Sigh. What mass murder?
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
	        819 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
	        884 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
	        911 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
	        919 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
	        858 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
	        940 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
	        879 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
	        811 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
	        980 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
	        927 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
	        926 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
	        1005 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Meh
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
	        839 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
	        843 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
	        929 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
	        896 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
	        909 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
	        834 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
	        858 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
	        922 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
	        855 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
	        999 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions  - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        959 Views
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        959 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        959 Views
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
	        959 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			Nice way to avoid the argument.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
	        902 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I'm just done talking in circles.  You seem to think that because people
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
	        930 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			I concede
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
	        838 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
	        965 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Morals are subjective anyhow,
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
	        920 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
	        843 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
	    
	         - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
	        918 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
	        983 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
	    
	         - 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
	        842 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive,  Operation Chaos Rules
	    
	         - 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
	        1144 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
	    
	         - 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
	        888 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
 