Active Users:1188 Time:16/09/2025 06:16:09 AM
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
no his actions are a ridiculous atrocity and his rationale is that those bodies were merely husks. The bigger issue isn't 100% what he did to all those people, but what he almost did to the Pattern! He could have destroyed the world in his effort to kill off one woman...


So you think a person with absolutely no free will, a puppet who mindlessly obeys Graendal is alive. Let me ask you a question. If you had a choice between that kind of existence and death, what would you choose.

Maybe you would rather exist than die, even as a mindless zombie and thats why you think it was wrong. I however would rather die than suffer like that. If WoT world were real, and I would be one of those in the palace, I would thank Rand if I could. Read my comparison to the paralysed blind mute person in one of the messages above to understand this better.

As for balefire.

If what you say is true, then I agree with you. If Rand came close to unraveling the pattern, just to kill Graendal, then indeed you are right and it would have been a insanely stupid thing to do.

But I argue that thats not what happened. I argue that LTT, having been there when balefire was developed and used knows how much to use. I argue that LTT/Rand knows far better how much the pattern can take than anyone else. I argue that despite whatever subjective reaction Min may have had, Rand did NOT significantly damage the pattern. Read some of the earlier posts for my attempts to examine this particular issue, I will not bother repeating it for you.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1663 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1067 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1068 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1111 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1001 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 898 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1022 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 929 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 899 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 850 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 858 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 806 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 839 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 819 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 974 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 880 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 951 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 858 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 925 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 859 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 917 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 841 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 960 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 964 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 883 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 994 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 805 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 944 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 454 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 874 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 886 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 838 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 482 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 822 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 471 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 834 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 808 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 934 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 854 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 897 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 891 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 897 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 888 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 912 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 841 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 938 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 788 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 897 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 863 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 872 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 887 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 832 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 899 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 849 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 784 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 957 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 891 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 877 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 845 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 879 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 785 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 811 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 971 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 808 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 816 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 897 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 858 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 864 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 941 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 805 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 814 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 880 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 829 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 968 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 919 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 867 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 908 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 807 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 914 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 878 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 894 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 818 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 897 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1055 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1189 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 787 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 832 Views

Reply to Message