Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
I don't think it takes that much to exercise imagination in this regard. Rand's defeated Rahvin by confronting him directly, and Rahvin's modus operandi and intelligence mirror Graendals pretty well.
Anyway, frankly speaking, I don't think that your failure to imagine any other possibility aside from massive use of balefire as a solution to this problem would prevent you from explaining why the thousands of ways Rand could have done this differently would not have worked.
My response is that Rand was a psycho and verging on becoming the Dark One's pawn in TGS and that scene especially.
Honestly, sometimes I think there are fans that would have preferred Rand balefired Nynaeve, destroyed the Borderland armies and perhaps Far Madding and then balefired the Seanchan with the amount of glee some of the more disturbing scenes in TGS produced.
Anyway, frankly speaking, I don't think that your failure to imagine any other possibility aside from massive use of balefire as a solution to this problem would prevent you from explaining why the thousands of ways Rand could have done this differently would not have worked.
My response is that Rand was a psycho and verging on becoming the Dark One's pawn in TGS and that scene especially.
Honestly, sometimes I think there are fans that would have preferred Rand balefired Nynaeve, destroyed the Borderland armies and perhaps Far Madding and then balefired the Seanchan with the amount of glee some of the more disturbing scenes in TGS produced.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1875 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1291 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1125 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1206 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1106 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1101 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1069 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1073 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1164 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1074 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1174 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1110 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1149 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1076 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1144 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1585 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1174 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1199 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
566 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1069 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
573 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
1014 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1151 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1125 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1102 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1091 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1107 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1088 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1196 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1045 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1037 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
1001 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1173 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
1013 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1070 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1081 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1098 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1030 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1104 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1072 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
987 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1139 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1113 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1129 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1181 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
1021 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
1007 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1103 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1073 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1066 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
994 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1035 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1114 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1023 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1190 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1136 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1136 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1077 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1103 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
1023 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1139 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1088 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1021 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1099 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1149 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1022 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1307 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1061 Views
