Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
I don't think it takes that much to exercise imagination in this regard. Rand's defeated Rahvin by confronting him directly, and Rahvin's modus operandi and intelligence mirror Graendals pretty well.
Anyway, frankly speaking, I don't think that your failure to imagine any other possibility aside from massive use of balefire as a solution to this problem would prevent you from explaining why the thousands of ways Rand could have done this differently would not have worked.
My response is that Rand was a psycho and verging on becoming the Dark One's pawn in TGS and that scene especially.
Honestly, sometimes I think there are fans that would have preferred Rand balefired Nynaeve, destroyed the Borderland armies and perhaps Far Madding and then balefired the Seanchan with the amount of glee some of the more disturbing scenes in TGS produced.
Anyway, frankly speaking, I don't think that your failure to imagine any other possibility aside from massive use of balefire as a solution to this problem would prevent you from explaining why the thousands of ways Rand could have done this differently would not have worked.
My response is that Rand was a psycho and verging on becoming the Dark One's pawn in TGS and that scene especially.
Honestly, sometimes I think there are fans that would have preferred Rand balefired Nynaeve, destroyed the Borderland armies and perhaps Far Madding and then balefired the Seanchan with the amount of glee some of the more disturbing scenes in TGS produced.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1940 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1406 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1195 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1282 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1184 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1170 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1140 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1142 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1233 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1156 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1244 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1196 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1212 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1141 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1216 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1657 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1242 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1269 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
605 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1145 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
609 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
1084 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1227 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1197 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1177 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1171 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1185 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1154 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1284 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1111 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1101 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
1069 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1260 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
1106 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1130 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1143 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1161 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1097 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1177 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1138 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
1059 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1208 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1193 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1202 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1249 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
1099 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
1076 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1179 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1147 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1136 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
1060 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1106 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1198 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1090 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1255 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1206 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1206 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1134 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1194 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
1091 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1211 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1157 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1109 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1160 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1209 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1084 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1381 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1131 Views
