Active Users:1121 Time:31/10/2025 05:56:06 PM
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
I don't think it takes that much to exercise imagination in this regard. Rand's defeated Rahvin by confronting him directly, and Rahvin's modus operandi and intelligence mirror Graendals pretty well.

Anyway, frankly speaking, I don't think that your failure to imagine any other possibility aside from massive use of balefire as a solution to this problem would prevent you from explaining why the thousands of ways Rand could have done this differently would not have worked.

My response is that Rand was a psycho and verging on becoming the Dark One's pawn in TGS and that scene especially.

Honestly, sometimes I think there are fans that would have preferred Rand balefired Nynaeve, destroyed the Borderland armies and perhaps Far Madding and then balefired the Seanchan with the amount of glee some of the more disturbing scenes in TGS produced.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1705 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1112 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1107 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1133 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1033 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 931 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1048 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 955 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 945 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 884 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 897 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 852 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 887 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 876 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1004 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 907 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 983 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 912 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 968 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 904 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 964 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 872 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 994 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1003 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 944 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1032 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 839 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 982 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 477 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 911 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 924 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 876 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 493 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 847 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 487 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 867 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 835 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 982 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 907 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 933 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 932 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 923 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 919 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 963 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 871 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 987 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 819 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 925 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 887 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 911 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 922 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 858 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 941 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 879 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 812 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 980 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 927 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 928 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 877 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 911 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 821 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 839 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1005 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 842 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 843 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 931 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 898 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 909 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 971 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 836 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 860 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 925 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 857 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1001 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 959 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 903 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 933 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 839 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 967 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 905 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 920 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 845 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 920 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1095 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1225 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 817 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 869 Views

Reply to Message