Active Users:334 Time:02/07/2025 07:02:10 AM
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
Rand Travels in disguised under an illusion of invisibility, tracks Graendal down by advancing through her palace and balefires her while she is bathing.

Or a re-use of the Rahvin Scenario: Rand Travels in with a fighting force with orders to only kill those Compelled to attack them, he brings Nynayeve/Cadsuane/random Aes Sedai in his retinue/Wondergirl/a channeling member of his harem/Wise Ones in to detect saidar. Graendal has some sort of defense that doesn't take him out, he chases her down preventing her Gateways from opening all the way each time she tries and finally balefires her just as she's about to escape through an inverted Gateway.

Etc, etc.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 07/01/2010 at 09:34:09 PM
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1619 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1021 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1016 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1046 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 949 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 856 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 974 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 892 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 859 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 808 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 811 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 770 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 796 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 777 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 932 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 840 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 903 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 790 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 883 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 816 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 855 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 800 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 911 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 926 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 840 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 950 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 766 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 870 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 427 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 830 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 848 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 800 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 460 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 778 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 430 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 787 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 760 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 897 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 816 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 855 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 849 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 836 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 832 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 850 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 809 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 866 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 752 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 843 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 822 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 831 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 844 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 788 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 857 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 786 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 731 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 910 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 844 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 827 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 778 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 833 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 744 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 765 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 921 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 763 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 772 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 847 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 793 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 825 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 902 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 771 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 776 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 839 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 780 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 924 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 880 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 830 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 864 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 759 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 868 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 819 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 847 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 775 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 854 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1011 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1139 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 742 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 784 Views

Reply to Message