Active Users:355 Time:30/10/2026 09:43:53 PM
Re: What might work... Datakim Send a noteboard - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM
Is to make a barrier around Graendal's palace, so that she can't Travel away. This seems to be possible, because the Lightside even considered to make a barrier around SG with the Choedan Kal.
After this, Rand could go in through a little hole in the barrier - maybe with some additional troops - and smoke out the enemy.

Of course, to simply balefire the whole palace is easier, even if innocent people are hit.


That would have been the best way. I think I even mentioned somewhere before that this would have been an easy and obvious thing to do. Arguably even easier than what he did in a way since Rand could have been able to see Graendals death with his own eyes that way.

But while RJ says this might be done(blocking gateways), I don't think Rand knows how. I wonder if that means LTT does not know either. I would have expected that he would but the fact that this is never considered might imply he does not. Unless ofcourse this is one of those facts Rand has yet to learn.

I wonder if this might come into play in the next book. Maybe the new Rand/LTT combo coming down from Dragonmount will teach the Asha'man to block traveling. That might help blunt the Seanchan advantage of getting traveling from Elaida.


Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1940 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1406 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1347 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1387 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1284 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 1195 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1282 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 1185 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 1170 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 1140 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 1142 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 1110 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 1136 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 1129 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1233 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 1156 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1244 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 1196 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1212 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 1141 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1217 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 1116 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1236 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1242 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 1189 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1265 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 1082 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1269 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 605 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 1145 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 1143 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 1110 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 609 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 1084 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 605 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 1126 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 1061 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1227 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 1197 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 1177 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 1171 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 1185 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 1154 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1284 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 1111 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1260 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 1106 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 1162 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 1130 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 1144 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 1161 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 1098 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 1177 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 1139 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 1059 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1208 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 1193 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 1202 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 1099 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 1157 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 1045 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 1069 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1249 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 1099 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 1076 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 1180 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 1147 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 1136 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1204 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 1060 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 1106 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 1198 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 1090 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1255 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1206 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 1134 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 1194 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 1091 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1211 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 1165 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 1157 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 1109 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 1161 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1348 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1470 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 1045 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 1092 Views

Reply to Message